Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00421330
NCT00421330
Unknown
Not Applicable

Endovascular Versus Transabdominal Treatment of the Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: the Dutch Randomised Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM-) Trial

UMC Utrecht0 sites392 target enrollmentNovember 2000

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Sponsor
UMC Utrecht
Enrollment
392
Primary Endpoint
combined operative mortality and morbidity
Last Updated
17 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this trial is to assess whether the new endovascular repair technique of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an adequate substitute of the conventional AAA repair.

Detailed Description

After the introduction of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), both benefits and drawbacks of this new technique have been reported. To assess whether the new technique is an adequate substitute of conventional AAA repair, a randomised study is required. The DREAM trial is a randomised multicenter trial enrolling patients eligible for elective treatment of infrarenal AAAs. The primary endpoint is combined operative mortality and morbidity. Secondary endpoints and additional assessments include event-free survival, quality of life,and costs.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 2000
End Date
December 2007
Last Updated
17 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Asymptomatic, infrarenal AAA that requires surgery
  • Adequate infrarenal neck
  • Other aortic-iliac anatomical configuration suitable for EVAR according to the criteria of the device to be used
  • Patient having a life expectation of at least 2 years and cleared for transabdominal intervention
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • ruptured AAA or symptomatic AAA, which requires emergency surgery
  • maximum aneurysm diameter\< 5.0 cm
  • suprarenal AAA
  • Inflammatory AAA (more than minimal wall thickening)
  • infrarenal neck unsuitable for endovascular fixation or aortic-iliac anatomic configuration otherwise unsuitable for EVAR according to criteria of the device to be used
  • bilateral retroperitoneal incision required for EVAR
  • sacrifice of both hypogastric arteries required
  • anatomical variations, i.e. horseshoe-kidney, arteries requiring reimplantation
  • patient unsuitable for laparotomy
  • administration of contrast agent not possible: proved, severe systemic reaction to contrast agent

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

combined operative mortality and morbidity

Time Frame: 5-8 years

Secondary Outcomes

  • event free survival(5-8 years)
  • quality of life(5-8 years)
  • cost-effectiveness(5-8 years)

Similar Trials