Comparative efficacy of I-Gel, Laryngeal Mask Airway-Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway-Protector in Short Surgical Procedures under General Anaesthesia with Spontaneous Ventilation - A Randomised Clinical Trial
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Dr Damandeep Kaur
- Enrollment
- 120
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- To compare the efficacy of I-Gel, LMA Supreme, and LMA Protector in maintaining a patent airway during short surgical procedures.
Overview
Brief Summary
While previous studies have compared different supraglottic airway devices or focused on other aspects, a dedicated investigation directly comparing these three commonly used devices could offer more precise guidance to clinicians in selecting the most suitable device for positive pressure ventilation in anesthetized patients. Therefore, our study aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive comparison among I-Gel, LMA-Supreme and LMA Protector, focusing on insertion ease, insertion time, placement attempts, airway leak pressure, and complications, ultimately aiming to optimize patient care and outcomes in anesthesia settings.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Masking
- Participant Blinded
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18.00 Year(s) to 60.00 Year(s) (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •ASA Grading I ,II Patients undergoing elective short surgeries less than 1.5hrs under general anaesthesia.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Non Consenting Patient BMI more than 30Kg/m2 Difficult airway MPC Class ≥3 Uncontrolled Co-morbid illness H/O GERD, Hiatus Hernia Musculo-skeletal Abnormalities Like Cervical Spine Deformities Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
To compare the efficacy of I-Gel, LMA Supreme, and LMA Protector in maintaining a patent airway during short surgical procedures.
Time Frame: Baseline(To) | 1 min after insertion T1 | 3 min T2 | 5 min T3 | 15 min T4 | 30 min T5 | 45 min T6 | 60 min T7 | 75 min T8 | 90 min T9 | 105min T10
Secondary Outcomes
- To evaluate the insertion characteristics, including ease and success rates, of the three supraglottic airway devices.
Investigators
Damandeep Kaur
Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research