Effects of Self-efficacy, Planning, and Self-efficacy+Planning Interventions on Body Fat Among Adolescents

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Adolescent Behavior

Interventions: Behavioral: Self-Efficacy
Behavioral: Planning
Behavioral: Education

Registration Number: NCT02689973

Lead Sponsor: University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw

Brief Summary: This longitudinal experimental study tested the effects of three brief interventions: (1) prompting the formation of plans (or implementation intentions), (2) prompting self-efficacy beliefs, and (3) prompting planning + self-efficacy in adolescents aged 14-18 years relative to an active 'education only' control group.

It was hypothesized that participants assigned to the interventions would exhibit a smaller increase in body fat at 14-month follow-up compared to controls. The study also investigated whether the combined planning + self-efficacy intervention would have larger effects on the main outcome (body fat) than single-component interventions. Second, it was hypothesized that the effects of the intervention conditions on body fat at 14-month follow-up would be mediated by their respective psychological and behavioral constructs: self-efficacy and planning at T2 (Mediator 1), and by moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at T3 (Mediator 2). It was expected that the effects of the interventions including the planning component (i.e., planning intervention and self-efficacy + planning intervention) would be mediated by respective cognitions, i.e. planning, whereas the effects of the interventions including self-efficacy component (i.e., self-efficacy intervention and self-efficacy + planning intervention) would be mediated by self-efficacy. Finally, it was explored whether the effects of the intervention (both direct and indirect effects, via their respective psychological variables and MVPA) on body fat would be moderated by the presence of built PA facilities, located in the proximity of schools.

Detailed Description: The experimental procedures were integrated into a health promotion and education program.

Pre-manipulation education: Across the study groups, participants received a common healthy lifestyle education program, focusing on nutrition and physical activity, which was a part of the school curriculum. The combination of nutrition and PA interventions is in line with best practice guidelines for interventions promoting healthy body weight. The education program was delivered by teachers and a group format was used. The groups discussed food composition, safe food handling, food labeling, nutrient needs for age and gender groups, dietary guidelines, and clinical nutrition issues. The program did not include behavior change techniques and was not accompanied by changes in policies.

The intervention conditions were delivered via a combination of printed forms with paper-and-pencil exercises and face-to-face sessions. All experimental conditions included an initial session (completing the forms individually in the groups + face-to-face component) and sets of handouts for three following weeks. The face-to-face component was delivered within three days of completing the initial forms. The initial session was followed by a booster session (group + face-to-face components), delivered at 2-month follow-up. Across the groups, completing the forms (individual component) took approximately 30 minutes and was conducted in classrooms. The face-to-face components took 45-60 minutes and were conducted in the offices of school nurses or school psychologists.

Group intervention component. At the baseline participants completed the intervention materials individually, using self-copy paper; the copies were collected for fidelity analysis and originals were left for participants. The paper-and-pencil materials followed a similar format in four groups in terms of word count, visual format, and the number and length of sections requiring participants filling in the blanks.

Face-to-face intervention component. During the face-to-face component (at the baseline and during the booster sessions) all participants received feedback on their body weight, information regarding their physical activity levels and energy expenditure based on participant's age, gender, body weight, followed by moderate-to-vigorous physical activity recommendations (body mass and body fat measured during the booster session was not recorded). Next, all participants and experimenters jointly reviewed the forms completed during the group component. Adolescents reported included plans and were prompted to provide even more detailed responses to questions included in the forms. Experimenters asked participants to read the content of the form loudly; looked for sections which were incomplete and encouraged adolescents to complete these sections; prompted participants to provide detailed responses.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 1217

Inclusion Criteria

Healthy adolescents
Adolescents with chronic conditions but without contraindications for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Exclusion Criteria

Adolescents who were younger than 14 years old
Adolescents who declared plans for changing schools during the following year (e.g., due to graduation or moving to another region)
No parental consent at the baseline
Existing diseases with contraindications for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Planning	Education	The following BCT were included in the planning intervention protocol: action planning, barrier identification, prompting self-talk, relapse prevention/coping planning. Applications of all BCT included references to planning. The intervention was integrated into health promotion-nutrition education program (8h). The intervention was applied twice (the baseline and 2-month follow-up).
Self-efficacy	Self-Efficacy	The self-efficacy intervention protocol included following behavior change techniques (BCT; Michie et al., 2011): barrier identification, prompting focus on past success, and prompting self-talk. Applications of all BCT included references to self-efficacy beliefs. The intervention was integrated into health promotion-nutrition education program (8h). The intervention was applied twice (the baseline and 2-month follow-up).
Self-efficacy	Education	The self-efficacy intervention protocol included following behavior change techniques (BCT; Michie et al., 2011): barrier identification, prompting focus on past success, and prompting self-talk. Applications of all BCT included references to self-efficacy beliefs. The intervention was integrated into health promotion-nutrition education program (8h). The intervention was applied twice (the baseline and 2-month follow-up).
Planning	Planning	The following BCT were included in the planning intervention protocol: action planning, barrier identification, prompting self-talk, relapse prevention/coping planning. Applications of all BCT included references to planning. The intervention was integrated into health promotion-nutrition education program (8h). The intervention was applied twice (the baseline and 2-month follow-up).
Combined planning+self-efficacy	Self-Efficacy	This condition included all BCT applied in the planning and self-efficacy arms. The intervention was integrated into health promotion-nutrition education program. The intervention was applied twice (the baseline and 2-month follow-up).
Combined planning+self-efficacy	Education	This condition included all BCT applied in the planning and self-efficacy arms. The intervention was integrated into health promotion-nutrition education program. The intervention was applied twice (the baseline and 2-month follow-up).
Combined planning+self-efficacy	Planning	This condition included all BCT applied in the planning and self-efficacy arms. The intervention was integrated into health promotion-nutrition education program. The intervention was applied twice (the baseline and 2-month follow-up).
Education	Education	The education group received extended physical activity education program. The physical activity education was integrated into health promotion-nutrition education program.The education program was applied twice (the baseline and 2-month follow-up).

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Body Fat Tissue	Baseline to 14-month follow-up	bioimpedance (BIA) method (Kyle et al., 2004), which determines the electrical impedance of an electric current through body tissues. Fat tissue was estimated with Schaefer equation for BIA which is considered a reliable index of body fat in adolescent from primarily white backgrounds (Cleary et al., 2008).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Physical Activity Self-efficacy (PA Self-efficacy)	Baseline to 2-month follow-up	Physical activity self-efficacy (T1 and T2) was measured with 9 items (e.g., 'I am able to maintain regular MVPA even if I would have to reorganize my daily life'; Luszczynska et al., 2011). Number of Items: 9 Response format: Responses ranged from 1 ('definitely not') to 4 ('exactly true'). Scoring: the total score of 9 items divided by 9 Scoring formula: the sum score for the 9 items divided by 9, i.e. {item #1 + item #2 + item #3 + item #4+ item #5 + item #6 + item #7 + item #8 + item #9} : 9 The range for score (i.e. the sum score of 9 items divided by 4): minimum = 1, maximum = 4 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better results (the higher levels of PA self-efficacy)
The Use of Physical Activity Planning (the Use of Planning)	Baseline to 2-month follow-up	Use of physical activity planning was measured with four items (e.g., 'I have my own plan regarding when to engage in exercise of moderate-to-vigorous intensity'; Schwarzer et al., 2008). Number of Items: 4 Response format: Responses ranged from 1 ('definitely not') to 4 ('exactly true'). Scoring: the total score of 4 items Scoring formula: the sum score for the 4 items divided by 4, i.e. {item #1 + item #2 + item #3 + item #4} : 4 The range for the score (i.e. the sum score of 4 items divided by 4): minimum = 1, maximum = 4 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better results (the more frequent use of planning)
Moderate-to-vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA)	Baseline to 14-month follow-up	Items from Godin and Shephard's (1985) Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (e.g., 'Considering a 7-day period \[a week\], how many times on the average do you do the following kinds of exercise for more than 15 minutes during your free time: strenuous exercise \[heart beats rapidly\], i.e. running, jogging, hockey, soccer, basketball, cross-country skiing, vigorous swimming, vigorous long distance bicycling'). Number of Items: 2 Response format: open ended, the participant indicated the number of 15 min blocks of physical activity. Scoring: the total (sum) score of 2 items Scoring formula: the sum score for the number of minutes of MVPA per week, i.e. individual score = {response to item #1 x 15} + {response to item # 2 x 15}) The range for the score (i.e. the sum score of 2 items): minimum = 0, maximum = 42 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better results (more minutes of MVPA per week)