MedPath

Comparing 150cm OAGB With 150cm Biliopancreatic Limb RYGB. A Non-inferiority Trial

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Obesity
Bariatric Surgery Candidate
Obesity, Morbid
Registration Number
NCT04852198
Lead Sponsor
Flevoziekenhuis
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficiency of OAGB compared to RYGB

Detailed Description

Rationale: to compare two different types of gastric bypass operations on surgical outcome.

Objective: to compare two established procedures in order to find the optimal procedure in terms of weight loss and metabolic control that is associated with the fewest side-effects and complications, and decreased invasiveness.

Study design: A multicentre, open label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial Study population: Patients are eligible for inclusion if their body-mass index (BMI) was 40 kg/m2 or higher, or 35 kg/m2 or higher with the presence of at least one comorbidity (type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, obstructive sleep apnoea, dyslipidaemia, osteoarthritis of the hip or knee) and a positive evaluation by our bariatric multidisciplinary team (BMDT) and are aged 18-65.

Intervention: Group 1: One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with 150cm biliopancreatic limb. Group 2: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with biliopancreatic limb of 150cm and 75cm alimentary limb.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

Primary endpoint:

% Excess BMI loss at two years

Secondary endpoints:

Metabolic status Nutritional status Comorbidity remission QOL Complications or serious adverse events (SAE's)

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
298
Inclusion Criteria
  • body-mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m2 or higher, or 35 kg/m2 or higher with the presence of at least one comorbidity (type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, obstructive sleep apnoea, dyslipidaemia, osteoarthritis of the hip or knee)
  • a positive evaluation by our BMDT
Exclusion Criteria
  • Presence of H. Pylori, resistant to eradication therapy
  • chronic diarrhoea
  • history of previous bariatric or extensive abdominal surgery

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage excess BMI loss at 2 years (%EBMIL)2 years

Percentage excess BMI loss after 2 years of follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Flevoziekenhuis

🇳🇱

Almere, Netherlands

OLVG

🇳🇱

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Flevoziekenhuis
🇳🇱Almere, Netherlands
Floris Bruinsma, MD
Contact
florisbruinsma@live.nl
Christel Boons, PhD
Contact
wetenschapsbureau@flevoziekenhuis.nl

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.