Evaluating a Fasting-mimicking Diet in Combination With Immunotherapy in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
- Conditions
- Stage IV NSCLCNSCLCImmunotherapyFasting Mimicking Diet
- Registration Number
- NCT06671613
- Lead Sponsor
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to learn the effects of fasting on cancer cells while you get maintenance treatment.
- Detailed Description
Cancer cells use an increased supply of glucose to make energy and do not have protection against fasting that normal cells do. Because of this, researchers would like to study how fasting may help immunotherapy target cancer cells. Initial studies suggest that fasting may decrease the side effects of immunotherapy and increase the chances of your cancer responding to the immunotherapy. Patient populations will have non-small cell lung cancer in which pembrolizumab have been recommended to treat the cancer as part of standard care
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 66
- 18 years at the time of informed consent
- Ability to provide written informed consent and HIPAA authorization.
- Eastern cooperative group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2
- Newly diagnosed histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Patients with locally advanced NSCLC that are not candidates for definitive therapy but are candidates for trial are allowed per investigator discretion.
- BMI 19 kg/m2
- Patients should be enrolled prior to starting standard of care immunotherapy for the treatment of stage IV NSCLC. Patients should be on PD (L)1 inhibitor alone (i.e., with PD-L1 expression 50%) in the metastatic setting. The investigators will allow single agent pembrolizumab only as the checkpoint inhibitor.
- Patients requiring palliative radiation or definitive radiation to an oligometastatic disease prior to the initiation of single agent checkpoint inhibitors are allowed once radiation has been completed and patients have recovered from toxicities.
- Self-reported weight loss of > 10% in the 6 weeks prior to study entry
- History of symptomatic hypoglycemia or uncontrolled diabetes
- Prior therapies with inhibitors of insulin growth factor I(IGF-1) such as Linsitinib or Picropodophyllin
- Concurrent use of somatostatin
- Concurrent use of immunosuppressive medications including sirolimus, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, prednisone, dexamethasone, or cyclosporine
- Significant food allergies which would make the subject unable to consume the food provided.
- History or current evidence of any uncontrolled medical or psychiatric condition, therapy that may confound the results of the trial, interfere with the subject's participation for the full duration of the trial, or is not in the best interest of the participating subject as deemed by the treating investigator.
- Pregnant or lactating females are not eligible.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Feasibility of fasting mimicking diet intervention Through study completion up to 2 years. Feasibility will be defined as the proportion of the patients who can finish the 3 cycles FMD without serious adverse events. The investigators define FMD as being a feasible intervention in NSCLC receiving checkpoint inhibitors if 70% of patients on study complete 3 cycles of FMD.
Compliance Through study completion up to 2 years. Compliance will be measured by analysis of daily food diaries at the end of each FMD cycle.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Immune Mediated Toxicities Through study completion up to 2 years. Toxicities as defined by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v5.0.
Overall response rate (ORR) Through study completion up to 2 years. ORR defined as complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.1 criteria.
Disease control rate (DCR) Through study completion up to 2 years. Defined as Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR) + Stable Disease (SD) per RECIST 1.1
.Progression Free Survival (PFS) Through study completion up to 2 years. Defined as time from day 1 of starting on study to disease progression by RECIST 1.1 or death from any cause.
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung-(FACT-L) Through study completion up to 2 years. A 36-item, questionnaire measured on a 5-point Likert scale with response options ranging from "not at all" to "very much." Total scores are summed in the range of 0 to 136. Higher scores indicate better QOL.
European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life -(EORTC QLQ-C30) Through study completion up to 2 years. A 30-item questionnaire measured on a 4-point response option ranging from ("not at all," to "very much"), except the global QoL scale which, has a 7-point response from ("very poor" to "excellent"). Scores range from 0-100, a higher score represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.
Trial Locations
- Locations (4)
VA Central California Health Care System, Fresno, CA
🇺🇸Fresno, California, United States
VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA
🇺🇸Long Beach, California, United States
Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN
🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United States