Reduction of Post-endodontic Pain After Single-visit RCT Using Balanced Force and Two Reciprocating System When Intracanal Cryotherapy is Used.

Universidad Autonoma de Baja California1 site in 1 country216 target enrollmentJanuary 4, 2018

ConditionsPost Operative Pain

Overview

Phase: Not Applicable
Intervention: Not specified
Conditions: Post Operative Pain
Sponsor: Universidad Autonoma de Baja California
Enrollment: 216
Locations: 1
Primary Endpoint: Evaluate the post-endodontic pain after single-visit After the root canal treatment with Balanced Force technique and two reciprocating system.
Status: Completed
Last Updated: 8 years ago

Overview Investigators Eligibility Criteria Outcomes Sites Similar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this research was to relate the occurrence of post-endodontic pain after single-visit RCT using Balanced Force technique and two reciprocating system when cryotherapy is used. Methodology: All 216 patients had upper or lower molar, premolar or anterior teeth selected for conventional RCT for prosthetic reasons detected with only vital pulps. Of the sample of 216 teeth, were selected to the 3 instrumentation methods. For hand instrumentation, Balanced Force were used. All canals were clean and shaped with hand Flex-R files (fMoyco/Union Broach, York PA, USA). For mechanical shaping, all instruments were used with a micro motor (VDW, Munich Germany). WaveOne and Reciproc instruments. Final irrigation with cold (6oC) 17% EDTA served as a lubricant.

Detailed Description

Patient selection Two hundred and sixteen of 245 patients (119 women and 97 men) aged 18-65 years were incorporated in this research while 29 were excluded as not meeting the inclusion criteria. (Fig. 1). Sample size estimate was achieved according with a method for this specific purpose (Cochran's method, 1986). Therefore, the 56 teeth allocated to each group were adequate to confirm an essential sample size. For hand instrumentation, the Balanced Force technique was used. All root canals were shaped with hand Flex-R files (Moyco/Union Broach, York PA, USA). Gates-Glidden drills (Dentsply Maillefer) sizes #2 and #3 were used at the orifice of the root canals. For mechanical preparations, all instruments were used with a micro motor (VDW Silver Motor, VDW, Munich Germany). Torque and rotation were preset for each Reciproc or WaveOne instrument. Rotary Ni-Ti instruments were used in continuous brushing rotary motion and reciprocating mode respectively. Dentinal debris was eliminated from the file with a gauze, instantaneously to the instrument change (WaveOne) or after 2-3 in-and-out (pecking) movements (Reciproc) following the manufacturers' recommendations. Each root canal was irrigated with 2.5mL 2.6% NaOCl. Irrigation was performed using a 24-gauge needle (Max-I-Probe; Tulsa Dental, York, PA) and a 31-G NaviTip needle (Ultradent Products Inc, South Jordan, UT) when reaching the WL after each instrument insertion. Group BF. For the Balanced Force group, the root canals were shaped and shaped using a #40 instrument for thin or curved canals and a #55 file for wide canals. Group WON. For the WaveOne group, a file size 25/.08 was used to prepare narrow, straight and curved canals, and a file size 40/.08 was used for large and wide canals. Three in-and-out pecking motions were used with an amplitude of not more than 3 mm until reaching the estimated working length. Group REC. The R25 (size 25/ .08) instrument was used in thin and curved root canals, and R40 files (40/ .06) were used in wide root canals. Three in-and-out pecking motions were used with an amplitude of not more than 3 mm until reaching the estimated working length.

Registry

clinicaltrials.gov

Start Date

January 4, 2018

End Date

February 6, 2018

Last Updated

8 years ago

Study Type

Interventional

Study Design

Factorial

Sex

All

Investigators

Sponsor

Universidad Autonoma de Baja California

Responsible Party

Principal Investigator

Jorge Paredes Vieyra

JORGE PAREDES VIEYRA D.D.S., MsC, PhD

Universidad Autonoma de Baja California

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

•The principal inclusion parameters were:
•absence of radiographic sign of apical periodontitis and a diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis (IP) established by affirmative response to hot and cold examinations.
•Thermal pulp examination was achieved by the corresponding author, and radiographic analysis was established by 3 certified endodontists.
•Clinical requirements were established on the next conditions: 1) The purposes and necessities of the research were spontaneously accepted. 2) Clinical Management was pointed to patients in physical and mental well-being. 3) All teeth had vital pulps and absence of apical periodontitis. 4) Positive thermal stimulation with EndoIce (Hygenic Corp, Akron, OH). 5) Teeth with enough coronal structure for rubber dam isolation. 6) No RCT done before the research. 7) No painkillers or antibiotics used 7 days' prior the clinical events started

Exclusion Criteria

•Exclusion parameters were:
•the necessity for retreatment
•gravidity
•impossibility to obtain patient's approval
•patients who didn't complete inclusion necessities
•a history of medication for chronic pain or those compromising the immune response
•patients younger than 18 years and the existence of mishaps or difficulties during RCT (calcified canals, impracticality of achieving AP in any canal).