ISRCTN28184453已完成不适用
Microwave endometrial ablation versus thermal balloon endometrial ablation - a pragmatic randomised comparison of postmenstrual treatment under general or local anaesthesia: clinical outcomes, patient acceptability and cost
HS Grampian (UK)0 个研究点目标入组 320 人开始时间: 2007年2月21日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 320
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 性别
- Female
入选标准
- •Women in the catchment area of Aberdeen Royal Infirmary with dysfunctional uterine bleeding who:
- •1. Have completed their family
- •2. Have normal endometrial pathology
- •3. Have a regular uterus cavity
- •4. Are willing to be randomised to microwave endometrial ablation or thermal balloon endometrial ablation under local anaesthesia
排除标准
- •1. Unable or unwilling to give informed consent
- •2. Those who in the opinion of the attending physician are thought to have limited life expectancy (less than one year)
- •3. Patients who currently or have within the last three months been involved with another research project
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Efficacy of microwave endometrial ablation for patients with previous uterine surgery: Retrospective studyhypermenorrheaJPRN-UMIN000046350ihon University Hospital35
尚未招募
不适用
Microwave endometrial ablation for hypermenorrheaHypermenorrheaJPRN-UMIN000002624The University of Tokushima6
已完成
不适用
Multicentre study comparing two endometrial ablation techniques in the office: bipolar endometrial ablation versus balloon endometrial ablatioISRCTN17974690Maxima Medical Center (Netherlands)104
尚未招募
不适用
Clinical study of microwave ablation vs. microwave ablation +Traditional Chinese medicine in treatment of thyroid microcarcinoma with multiple benign nodules: a randomized controlled trialITMCTR2200006554Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital
招募中
不适用
The safety and efficacy of microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation for colorectal cancer liver metastasis : A randomized controlled clinical trialColorectal liver metastasisJPRN-UMIN000036206Juntendo University104