Comparative Study of Endometrial Polypectomy Performed With Bipolar Electrode Versapoint vs Microscissors or Graspers
概览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 干预措施
- 未指定
- 疾病 / 适应症
- Endometrial Polyps
- 发起方
- University of Cagliari
- 入组人数
- 40
- 主要终点
- To assess the tolerability of polypectomy using a validated visual analogue pain scale
- 最后更新
- 10年前
概览
简要总结
Hysteroscopy today is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of endometrial polyps. Several hysteroscopic systems to resect endometrial polyps are currently available. Among Others bipolar systems and microscissors or graspers, both of theme make part of routine clinical practice and are universally accepted.
The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of bipolar resection energy polypectomy versus microscissors or graspers These procedures assume a lower cost and are associated with a lower surgical risk due to their realization without anesthesia .
Hypothesis: Resection of polyps outpatient laser diode has a similar or superior to that of the bipolar electrode tolerability. The diode laser is a viable , quick , simple technique with a high percentage of resection and high degree of satisfaction of patients
研究者
Stefano Angioni
Associate Professor
University of Cagliari
入排标准
入选标准
- •The patient must be informed about the study, and sign the informed consent
排除标准
- •Positive Pap smear test
- •Pregnancy
- •Uterine malignancy
- •Abnormal uterine bleeding
结局指标
主要结局
To assess the tolerability of polypectomy using a validated visual analogue pain scale
时间窗: we measure pain after resection of endometrial polyps, with 5 minutes for the patient thinks