Study of Mirogabalin for Central Neuropathic Pain
- Registration Number
- NCT03901352
- Lead Sponsor
- Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.
- Brief Summary
Investigate the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin in participants with central neuropathic pain in comparison to placebo
- Detailed Description
\[Double Blind Phase\] The primary objective is to compare change in the Average Daily Pain Score (ADPS) from baseline to Week 14 in Asian participants with central neuropathic pain (central neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury) receiving mirogabalin versus placebo.
\[Open Extension Phase\] The objective is to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of mirogabalin in participants with central neuropathic pain (central neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury, central post stroke pain, and central neuropathic pain in Parkinson's disease).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 300
- Spinal cord injury (SCI) due to trauma
- American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale A, B, C, or D
- Other severe pain at screening or randomization, unrelated to central neuropathic pain after SCI, that may confound the assessment of central neuropathic pain after SCI
- Neurologic disorders at screening or randomization, unrelated to central neuropathic pain after SCI, that may confound the assessment of central neuropathic pain after SCI
- Major psychiatric disorders within 1 year prior to screening
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Placebo Placebo Placebo (14-weeks) Mirogabalin Mirogabalin The patients with creatinine clearance (CLcr) ≥ 60 mL/min: Mirogabalin 20 mg or 30 mg, oral administration, Treatment period; 2-weeks titration and 12-weeks maintenance dose. The patients with creatinine clearance (CLcr) 30 to \< 60 mL/min: Mirogabalin 10 mg or 15 mg, oral administration, Treatment period; 2-weeks titration and 12-weeks maintenance dose
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average Daily Pain Score (ADPS) at Week 14 Following Administration With Mirogabalin or Placebo Baseline to Week 14 postdose The pain scores on a scale of 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst possible pain. Negative changes in ADPS indicated an improvement in pain scores. The weekly ADPS is based on participants daily pain scores.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Participants With ≥30% Reduction and ≥50% Reductions From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score (ADPS) Baseline to Week 14 postdose Responder rate (%) = 100 × (observed weekly ADPS - baseline weekly ADPS) / baseline weekly ADPS, where the baseline weekly ADPS was defined as the average of up to 7 available pain scores in the last 7 days at or before the randomization visit (Visit 2).
Change From Baseline in Present Pain Intensity on the Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire at Week 14 Following Administration With Mirogabalin or Placebo Baseline to Week 14 postdose Participants rated their present pain intensity on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 5 (most intense pain). Negative changes in present pain intensity indicated an improvement in pain intensity.
Patient Global Impression of Change at Week 14 Following Administration With Mirogabalin or Placebo at Week 14 postdose At the end-of-treatment (Visit 7)/early termination visit, participants provided a self-assessment of their condition compared to the randomization visit (Visit 2) using the 7-point scale in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), where 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Here, the PGIC responder rates were categorized and defined as the percentage of participants who satisfied the following PGIC score criteria: Minimally improved or better (ie, score ≤3); Much improved or better (ie, score ≤2). Patient Global Impression of Change scores are used to determine categorical responder rates.
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average Daily Sleep Interference Score (ADSIS) Following Administration With Mirogabalin or Placebo Baseline to Week 14 postdose The daily sleep interference diary consisted of an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) which was used to assess how pain had interfered with the participant's sleep during the past 24 hours. Participants recorded a sleep interference score in the patient diary once daily from the day after the screening visit (Visit 1) through the end-of-treatment (Visit 7)/early termination visit. Every morning upon awakening, prior to taking the study drug, each participant selected the number that best described his/her sleep interference experience during the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 = pain did not interfere with sleep to 10 = pain completely interfered with sleep. Negative values indicate an improvement in sleep interference. The weekly average daily sleep interference score (ADSIS) was based on the sleep interference scores from the patient diaries.
Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale Scores Following Administration With Mirogabalin or Placebo Baseline to Week 14 postdose The MOS sleep scale was based on questions about sleep quality during the past 4 weeks and consisted of 3 parts. Average time required to fall asleep, average hours of sleep per night, and ten questions based on sleep disturbance that were given a score of 1 (all the time) to 5 (none of the time). Based on the 12 questions, the following scales were calculated: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakening due to shortness of breath or headache, sleep adequacy, sleep somnolence, 9-item sleep item index, sleep quantity, and optimal sleep (not reported since it is a yes/no response). Each scale was given a score ranging from 1 (all the time) to 5 (none of the time), except for the 9-item sleep item index. Individual item scores of the 9-item sleep index were averaged and the total score ranged from 1 to 5. For all items reported, higher scores indicate an improvement in sleep disturbance.
Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale Following Administration With Mirogabalin or Placebo Baseline to Week 14 postdose The Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HADS) scale consisted of 7 items to score depression (4-point scale: 0 to 3; where a score of 3 indicates highest depression levels \[worse outcome\]) and 7 items to score anxiety (4-point scale: 0 to 3; where score of 3 indicates highest anxiety levels \[worse outcome\]). The depression and anxiety subscales were calculated by summing the corresponding scores for 7 items. Negative scores indicate an improvement in depression and anxiety.
Change From Baseline in the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory Score Following Administration With Mirogabalin or Placebo Baseline to Week 14 postdose The Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory assessment was comprised of 4 distinct dimensions of neuropathic pain: spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dysesthesia. Each dimension was scored on an 11-point scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the most intense pain imaginable) for reporting the mean intensity of each item of the dimension during the last 24 hours. The total score is the sum of each of the 4 dimensions of neuropathic pain and total score ranged from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicated worse outcome; negative values indicate an improvement.
Change From Baseline in the EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels Following Administration With Mirogabalin or Placebo Baseline to Week 14 postdose The EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EuroQoL-5D-5L) questionnaire yielded a 5-scale profile of the participant's self-assessed quality of life in each of the following dimensions: mobility (5-point scale), self-care (5-point scale), usual activities (5-point scale), pain/discomfort (5-point scale), and anxiety/depression (5-point scale). These profiles were combined into an overall health utilities index, and a visual analog scale (VAS) that measured the participants' perceptions of overall health. EQ-5D-5L index scores range from -0.59 (worst health state) to 1 (best possible health state). EQ VAS scores range from 0 (worse imaginable health or worst outcome) to 100 (best imaginable health or best outcome). Higher scores for index value and VAS indicate better outcome.
Change From Baseline in the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Scores Following Administration With Mirogabalin or Placebo Baseline to Week 14 postdose The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) score assessed the participants' activities of daily living (ADL). The SCIM instrument yielded a profile of the participant's ADL in the following categories: total SCIM score (0 to 100), self-care (scored 0 to 20; with higher scores indicating better self care), respiration and sphincter management (0 to 40; with higher scores indicating better management), and mobility (0 to 40; with higher scores indicating better mobility). Overall higher scores indicated better outcomes.
Number of Participants Who Performed At Level or Below Level for Allodynia Following Administration With Mirogabalin or Placebo Baseline to Week 14 postdose Study investigators performed the test for allodynia (at level, below level) using a scale assessing the presence (at level) or absence (below level) of allodynia. Testing usually requires an external stimulation of non-painful quality.
Change From Baseline in Present Pain Intensity on the Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire at Week 52 Following Administration With Mirogabalin During the Long-term Extension (LTE) Baseline to Week 52 postdose Participants rated their present pain intensity on a visual analog scale of 0 (no pain) to 5 (most intense pain). Higher scores indicate worse outcome; negative changes in present pain intensity indicated an improvement in pain intensity.
Trial Locations
- Locations (118)
Hyogo Social Welfare Corporation Hyogo Rehabilitation Center Central Hospital
🇯🇵Hyōgo, Japan
Funabashi Municipal Medical Center
🇯🇵Chiba, Japan
Steel Memorial Yawata Hospital
🇯🇵Fukuoka, Japan
Go Neurosurgical Clinic
🇯🇵Fukuoka, Japan
Shin Yukuhashi Hospital
🇯🇵Fukuoka, Japan
Japanese Red Cross Maebashi Hospital
🇯🇵Gunma, Japan
Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital
🇯🇵Hiroshima, Japan
Teine Keijinkai Hospital
🇯🇵Hokkaido, Japan
Nakamura Memorial Hospital
🇯🇵Hokkaido, Japan
Hokkaido Spinal Cord Injury Center
🇯🇵Hokkaido, Japan
National Hospital Organaization Kumamoto Medical Center
🇯🇵Kumamoto, Japan
Kumamoto Rehabilitation Hospital
🇯🇵Kumamoto, Japan
Uji-Tokushukai Medical Center
🇯🇵Kyoto, Japan
Junwakai Memorial Hospital
🇯🇵Miyazaki, Japan
Japan Red Cross Society Azumino Hospital
🇯🇵Nagano, Japan
Nagasaki University Hospital
🇯🇵Nagasaki, Japan
Nagasaki Rosai Hospital
🇯🇵Nagasaki, Japan
Nagaoka Chuo General Hospital
🇯🇵Niigata, Japan
Japanese Red Cross Society Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital
🇯🇵Niigata, Japan
Osaka University Hospital
🇯🇵Osaka, Japan
Otsu City Hospital
🇯🇵Shiga, Japan
Saiseikai Shiga Hospital
🇯🇵Shiga, Japan
Shizuoka City Shimizu Hospital
🇯🇵Shizuoka, Japan
Japanese Red Cross Hamamatsu Hospital
🇯🇵Shizuoka, Japan
Dokkyo Medical University Hospital
🇯🇵Tochigi, Japan
Medical Corporation Keiaikai Nakamura Hospital
🇯🇵Ōita, Japan
Daegu Fatima Hospital
🇰🇷Daegu, Korea, Republic of
Chungnam National University Hospital
🇰🇷Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
CHA Bundang Medical Center
🇰🇷Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
🇰🇷Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of
The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital
🇰🇷Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of
The Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital
🇰🇷Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of
Pusan National University Hospital
🇰🇷Pusan, Korea, Republic of
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
🇰🇷Pusan, Korea, Republic of
The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Samsung Medical Center
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Kimitsu Chuo Hospital
🇯🇵Chiba, Japan
Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital
🇯🇵Ehime, Japan
University of Fukui Hospital
🇯🇵Fukui, Japan
Medical Corporation Suiseikai Suiseikai Kajikawa Hospital
🇯🇵Hiroshima, Japan
Hakodate Municipal Hospital
🇯🇵Hokkaido, Japan
Sapporo Medical University Hospital
🇯🇵Hokkaido, Japan
Japanese Red Cross Kobe Hospital
🇯🇵Hyōgo, Japan
Iwate Rehabilitation Center
🇯🇵Iwate, Japan
Kanagawa Rehabilitation Hospital
🇯🇵Kanagawa, Japan
Honmachi Clinic
🇯🇵Aichi, Japan
Nagoya City West Medical Center
🇯🇵Aichi, Japan
Social Medical Corporation Daido Clinic
🇯🇵Aichi, Japan
Hachinohe City Hospital
🇯🇵Aomori, Japan
Chiba University Hospital
🇯🇵Chiba, Japan
Kyushu Rosai Hospital
🇯🇵Fukuoka, Japan
Sapporo City General Hospital
🇯🇵Hokkaido, Japan
Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital
🇯🇵Hyōgo, Japan
Toyota Kosei Hospital
🇯🇵Aichi, Japan
Nagoya Tokushukai General Hospital
🇯🇵Aichi, Japan
Fukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital
🇯🇵Fukui, Japan
Southern TOHOKU Medical Clinic
🇯🇵Fukushima, Japan
Ibaraki Seinan Medical Center Hospital
🇯🇵Ibaraki, Japan
Mie University Hospital
🇯🇵Mie, Japan
Nara Prefecture General Rehabilitation Center
🇯🇵Nara, Japan
Okayama City General Medical Center Okayama City Hospital
🇯🇵Okayama, Japan
Osaka Rosai Hospital
🇯🇵Osaka, Japan
Nihon University Itabashi Hospital
🇯🇵Tokyo, Japan
Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital
🇨🇳Hualien, Taiwan
Chubu-Rosai Hospital
🇯🇵Aichi, Japan
Kainan Hospital
🇯🇵Aichi, Japan
Chiba Rehabilitation Center
🇯🇵Chiba, Japan
Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety Spinal Injuries Center
🇯🇵Fukuoka, Japan
Japanese Red Cross Asahikawa Hospital
🇯🇵Hokkaido, Japan
Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital
🇯🇵Kagawa, Japan
Yokohama City Minato Red Cross Hospital
🇯🇵Kanagawa, Japan
Kumamoto Kinoh Hospital
🇯🇵Kumamoto, Japan
Tohoku Rosai Hospital
🇯🇵Miyagi, Japan
National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center
🇯🇵Miyagi, Japan
Hirosaki University Hospital
🇯🇵Aomori, Japan
Shin Komonji Hospital
🇯🇵Fukuoka, Japan
Fukushima Medical University Hospital
🇯🇵Fukushima, Japan
Goodlife Hospital
🇯🇵Hiroshima, Japan
Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital
🇯🇵Hiroshima, Japan
Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital
🇯🇵Hyōgo, Japan
Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital
🇯🇵Ishikawa, Japan
Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety(JOHAS), Yokohama Rosai Hospital
🇯🇵Kanagawa, Japan
University of Tsukuba Hospital
🇯🇵Ibaraki, Japan
Shikoku Medical Center for Children and Adults
🇯🇵Kagawa, Japan
Yokohama City University Hospital
🇯🇵Kanagawa, Japan
Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital
🇯🇵Kanagawa, Japan
Kumamoto Takumadai Rehabilitation Hospital
🇯🇵Kumamoto, Japan
Kibikogen Rehabilitation Center For Employment Injuries
🇯🇵Okayama, Japan
Osaka General Medical Center
🇯🇵Osaka, Japan
Toyama University Hospital Hospital
🇯🇵Toyama, Japan
Wakayama Medical University Hospital
🇯🇵Wakayama, Japan
Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital
🇯🇵Yamanashi, Japan
Katta General Hospital
🇯🇵Miyagi, Japan
Saga-ken Medical Centre KOSEIKAN
🇯🇵Saga, Japan
Shimane University Hospital
🇯🇵Shimane, Japan
Hamamatsu University Hospital
🇯🇵Shizuoka, Japan
Tokushima University Hospital
🇯🇵Tokushima, Japan
Makita General Hospital
🇯🇵Tokyo, Japan
University of Miyazaki Hospital
🇯🇵Miyazaki, Japan
Niigata City General Hospital
🇯🇵Niigata, Japan
Niigata University Medical & Dental Hospital
🇯🇵Niigata, Japan
Aijinkai Rehabilitation Hospital
🇯🇵Osaka, Japan
Hanyu General Hospital
🇯🇵Saitama, Japan
Fujieda Municipal General Hospital
🇯🇵Shizuoka, Japan
Kikugawa General Hospital
🇯🇵Shizuoka, Japan
Jichi Medical University Hospital
🇯🇵Tochigi, Japan
Medical Corporation Tapic Okinawa Rehabilitation Center Hospital
🇯🇵Okinawa, Japan
Tottori University Hospital
🇯🇵Tottori, Japan
Sanyudo Rehabilitation Center
🇯🇵Yamagata, Japan
National Hospital Organaization Murayama Medical Center
🇯🇵Tokyo, Japan
Yamaguchi University Hospital
🇯🇵Yamaguchi, Japan
Yamaguchi Rosai Hospital
🇯🇵Yamaguchi, Japan
National Taiwan University Hospital
🇨🇳Taipei city, Taiwan
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
🇨🇳Taipei city, Taiwan
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
🇨🇳Taoyuan, Taiwan
Seoul Universtiy Hospital
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Ajou University Hospital
🇰🇷Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of
Chonbuk National University Hospital
🇰🇷Jeollabuk-do, Korea, Republic of