SEMAGLUTIDE VERSUS GLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONISTS. EFFECTIVENESS , SAFETY AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS 2. OBSERVATIONAL, PROSPECTIVE AND MULTICENTER STUDY. SEVERAL STUDY.
- Conditions
- Weight LossDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Quality of LifeSafety Issues
- Interventions
- Drug: GLP-1 receptor agonist
- Registration Number
- NCT05136287
- Lead Sponsor
- Jose Seijas Amigo
- Brief Summary
Introduction:
GLP-1 receptor agonists (aGLP1) act increasing pancreatic insulin secretion in response to the glucose, they reduce glucagon secretion and reduce appetite by acting in the central level. Several aGLP1 were approved through different clinical trials where they showed efficacy in the glycemic control and reduction in cardiovascular events. They also showed weight loss in different clinical trials with patients with diabetes mellitus 2 (DM2) and also in specific clinical trial where the weight loss was the primary endpoint (STEP study).
Objective:
The objective is to evaluate and compare the weight loss in patients with DM2 treated with the different aGLP1 for the first time. Secondary endpoints are HbA1c reduction, changes in quality of life and physical activity and the safety of these drugs.
Design:
It is a postauthorization, multicenter, non-randomized and prospective study. Patients that will start treatment for the first time with aGLP1 will be recruited in 10 primary care centers in SERGAS Galician Hospitals for a period of 6 months and 44 weeks of follow-up. The primary endpoint will be to evaluate the wight loss with the different aGLP1 and the secondary endpoint will be HbA1c reduction, changes in the quality of life through the EuroQol-5D and changes physical activity through the SF-12 questionnaire, and also the safety of these drugs. The sample size will be of 360 patients.
Statistical analysis:
Previous studies showed efficacy in weight loss with semaglutide about (3,6-4,9 kg), while with other aGLP1 the weight loss was smaller , about (0,86-2,96 kg).
Based in these data and with a 5% of significance level, a weight loss average in the aGLP1 group of 2,5 kg, average in semaglutide group of 4,2 kg, and combination deviation of 3,0kg, including 360 subjects we will have a statistical power above 90% to detect differences through T-test for independent samples.
The justification of this simple size was performed with the statistical software SPSS 3.0
Conclusions:
The SEVERAL study will try to provide information about weight loss efficacy, changes in quality of life, physical activity and safety of the aGLP1in patients with DM2 that start treatment with these drugs in the real life (Real-World Evidence)
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 140
- Patients 18 years old or over
- To start with the first funded dose of GLP1 receptor agonists ( BMI > 30Kg/m2)
- Treated with another oral antidiabetic
- Diagnosis of diabetic retinopahty and family history of thyroid cancer
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Diabetes mellitus 2 patients with obesity GLP-1 receptor agonist Patients that meet criteria to start treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists (dulaglutide; exenatide; liraglutide; lixisenatide )
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Weight loss 11 months Assesment of changes in BMI ( weight (Kg) and height (cm) will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method HbA1c values 11 months HbA1c changes will be assessed during the study by routine sample tests (%)
Number of participants experiencing adverse events 11 months Gastrointestinal events; hypoglycemia; pancreatitis; fatigue; ijection reactions; Diabetic retinopathy; cardiac events and other possible events
Changes in Quality of life 11 months By using the questionnaire called EuroQol EQ-5D-3L assessment. It has 2 parts, the first one has 5 questions with 3 possible answers (5 dimensions and 3 levels), so each health status has a rate called EVA from 1,0000 (the highest value) to - 0,5095 (the worst health status).
The second part is a visual self-assessment between 0 (the worst health status) and 100 (the best health status). https://euroqol.org/Changes in Physical Activity 11 months By using the questionnaire called EuroQol SF-12 assessment.For each of the 8 dimensions, the items are coded, added and transformed on a scale that ranges from 0 (the worst health status for that dimension) to 100 (the best health status).
Trial Locations
- Locations (11)
Centro de Salud de Culleredo
🇪🇸Culleredo, A Coruña, Spain
Centro de Salud de Fene
🇪🇸Fene, A Coruña, Spain
Centro de Salud Valmiñor
🇪🇸Nigrán, Pontevedra, Spain
Hospital ClÃnico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela
🇪🇸Santiago De Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
Centro de Salud de Vilalba
🇪🇸Vilalba, Lugo, Spain
Centro de Salud de Ribeira
🇪🇸Ribeira, A Coruña, Spain
Centro de Salud de Ribadeo
🇪🇸Ribadeo, Lugo, Spain
Centro de Salud de O Carballiño
🇪🇸O Carballiño, Ourense, Spain
Centro de Salud Virxe Peregrina
🇪🇸Pontevedra, Spain
Centro de Salud de San Roque
🇪🇸Lugo, Spain
Centro de Salud de O Ventorrillo
🇪🇸A Coruña, Spain