Comparison of effect of two local anesthetic solutions in treating diseased teeth with constant sharp pain requiring root canal treatment
Phase 4
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- Bilateral mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis requiring endodontic treatment
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/04/013472
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Neha Deshpande
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Open to Recruitment
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Patients willing to participate in the study
Age group : 20 - 45 years
Patients having mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
Patients would have not undergone any previous dental local anesthetic experience, in order to be not influenced by a positive or a negative memory.
Patient has not taken any medication for the past 2 weeks
Exclusion Criteria
Pregnancy
Patients who received local anesthesia before the experiment
Subjects with systemic diseases
Patients on any kind of medication
History of psychiatric illness
Unco-operative patients
Active sites of infection in the area of injection.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Anesthetic efficacy of Articaine and LidocaineTimepoint: Any Pain during the endodontic treatment is considered anesthetic failure
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The onset of action and duration of action of Articaine and LidocaineTimepoint: Onset: when the patient starts to feel tingling sensation on the lip <br/ ><br>Duration : When the patient stops feeling the numbness