Knowledge Translation Interventions; which are most effective in upper limb rehabilitation?
- Conditions
- Strokebrain injuryClinician adherence to clinical practice guidelinesUpper limb hemiplegiaPhysical Medicine / Rehabilitation - Occupational therapyStroke - IschaemicStroke - HaemorrhagicInjuries and Accidents - Other injuries and accidentsNeurological - Other neurological disordersPhysical Medicine / Rehabilitation - Physiotherapy
- Registration Number
- ACTRN12619000596101
- Lead Sponsor
- a Trobe University
- Brief Summary
Both the facilitator-mediated (Group A) and the self-directed (Group B) implementation packages were feasible to deliver in the rehabilitation setting. Therapists in Group A displayed behaviour change and were found to adhere significantly more to clinical practice guideline recommendations after three months of intervention exposure. We found no significant behaviour change for participants of Group B or Group C from the beginning to the end of intervention. We found no significant differences between any of the groups for upper limb outcomes
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 29
Therapist participants inclusion criteria:
•Registered occupational therapist (OT) or physiotherapist (PT) working at one or two of the participating sites
•Working with an acquired brain injury patient (i.e. stroke and/or trauma) caseload.
Patient participants inclusion criteria:
•The treating therapist had consented to participating in the study;
•The patient was currently receiving therapy to address upper limb goal/s
•The patient has documented upper limb goals; and
•The patient (or their proxy) was able to provide consent to participate in the study.
Patient participants with a degenerative brain injury will be excluded.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Feasibility: Study recruitment of occupational therapists and physiotherapists (i.e. target users of the guidelines), assessed by determining the proportion of consented/those approached.[3 Months post-intervention commencement];Feasibility: Time commitment for study participation, assessed by calculating the total time reportedly spent on implementation activities per Group.[3 Months post-intervention commencement];Feasibility: Therapists perspectives on intervention feasibility, assessed via a survey of participating therapists at completion of study. The survey was designed specifically for this study.[3 Months post-intervention commencement]
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method