Comparison of Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Preparation, in Single and Multiple Visits, With Reciprocating and Rotary Single-File Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Sponsor
- Riyadh Elm University
- Enrollment
- 160
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Visual analogue scale
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Comparison of Postoperative Pain after Root Canal preparation, in Single and Multiple Visits, with Reciprocating and Rotary Single-File Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Aim:1. Compare between the postoperative pain after root canal preparation, in single and multiple visits.
- To assess the influence of reciprocating and rotary single-file systems instrumentation on post-operative pain.
Detailed Description
Subjects allocation and randomization method:
- All diagnoses and treatment procedures will be performed by a single operator in one visit or multiple visits to eliminate or minimize individual variability in the treatment between clinicians.
- Total of 160 patients, as per the inclusion criteria will be intervened. This will be divided into two groups as follows:
- Group A (n=80) single visit.
- Group B (n=80) multiple visits.
- Group A and B will be subdivided into two groups (each group=40) based on the motion of the files to be used either Reciprocation EOF (Edge one Fire file) or Rotational motion PN (ProTaper Next files). Each subgroup will be divided based on either the tooth is vital or non-vital (each subgroup=20) as shown in study design (Figure 1).
(Figure 1)
- A pulpal and periapical diagnoses will be done for each tooth on taking careful history, clinical and radiographic examination based on the American Association of Endodontists (AAE 2008) diagnostic guidelines.
- The treatments in groups A or B by ProTaper Next or Edge one Fire will be randomized with sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes (SNOSE) with 40 patients in PN group and 40 patients in EOF group with allocation sequence and assigning to intervention which will be done by blinded second investigator at the time of cleaning and shaping, concealed from operator to reduce bias.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 19 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •a. All permanent teeth diagnosed with vital or non-vital pulps and need nonsurgical root canal treatment.
- •b. Symptomatic, Asymptomatic maxillary and mandibular teeth with apical radiolucency c. All males and females with age between 19 to 60 years.
Exclusion Criteria
- •a. Teeth with Previously treated b. Teeth need surgical treatment. c. Primary teeth. d. Patients with sinus tract, periapical abscess and who had previously medications.
Arms & Interventions
Single visit
root canal treatment will be done in one visit
Intervention: protaper next (Behavioral)
multiple visit
root canal treatment will be done in multiple visit
Intervention: protaper next (Behavioral)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Visual analogue scale
Time Frame: 24 months
appointment treatment at 24 month \[ Time Frame: 12, 24, 48, h \] where 0 out of 10 scale will indicates no pain and 10 out of 10 indicates worse pain
Secondary Outcomes
- Verbal analogue scale(24 moths)
Investigators
Yahia Abdullah Alyami
postgraduate resident
Riyadh Elm University
