跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01597362
NCT01597362已完成不适用

Three Laparoscopic Access Techniques

Campus Bio-Medico University0 个研究点目标入组 608 人开始时间: 2006年2月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
608
主要终点
minor complications

研究概览

简要总结

The study compares the Veress needle technique, the Direct trocar insertion and the Open technique with each other, in terms of minor complications, in elective laparoscopic procedures for benign pathologies.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •not-obese adult patients referred for scheduled laparoscopic and gynecologic procedures,
  • •benign pathology
  • •no previous abdominal surgery
  • •Age range was 18-70 years

排除标准

  • •obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2
  • •previous abdominal surgery by laparoscopy or laparotomy
  • •history of PID
  • •irritable Bowel Syndrome
  • •suspicion of malignancy or malignancy at the histological examination

研究组 & 干预措施

Open technique

Other

干预措施: laparoscopy (Procedure)

Veress needle technique

Other

干预措施: Laparoscopy (Procedure)

Direct trocar technique

Other

干预措施: Laparoscopy (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

minor complications

时间窗: 1 year

feasibility of the techniques and the incidence of Veress needle, Direct technique insertion and Open technique related minor complications

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Campus Bio-Medico University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Cafa Ester Valentina

Principal Investigator

Campus Bio-Medico University

相似试验