Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2023/08/056183
CTRI/2023/08/056183
Not yet recruiting
未知

Comparison of outcome of luteal phase stimulation with follicular phase stimulation in Indian scenario. Does luteal phase stimulation maximize outcomes when compared to follicular phase stimulation alone? - NI

Dr Aruna Rajan0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD

Overview

Phase
未知
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Health Condition 1: Z314- Encounter for procreative investigation and testing
Sponsor
Dr Aruna Rajan
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Observational

Investigators

Sponsor
Dr Aruna Rajan

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Poseidon 3 and 4 category (AFC \<5 OR AMH \<1\.2\).
  • History of Previous Poor response ( \< 9 oocytes or Previous IVF cycles less than 2 good quality blastocyst).
  • If the Number of blastocyst formed is less than or equal to 2 in follicular phase stimulation in Normal responders.
  • Patient insisting on Luteal phase Stimulation.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Genetic Abnormalities.
  • More than 4 good quality blastocyst formed in Follicular phase Stimulation though inclusion criteria satisfied.
  • Patients not willing for Luteal Phase Stimulation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials