Comparison of Post-operative Pain After Use of Endo-activator and Conventional Irrigation During Endodontic Treatment in Symptomatic Periapical Periodontitis: a Randomized Control Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Comparison of post-operative pain after use of Endo-activator and conventional irrigation during endodontic treatment in symptomatic periapical periodontitis: a randomized control trial.
研究概览
简要总结
Introduction: The adequate removal of microorganisms, infected or necrotic pulp tissues and complete adequate seal of root canal system along with debridement is key to success of endodontic treatment. The objective of this study was to compare frequency of pain after using Endo Activator and conventional irrigation in patients presenting with symptomatic periapical periodontitis following endodontic treatment by means of Visual Analog Scale.
Methods: This study was designed as single blind, randomized control trial. Sixty patients with symptomatic teeth requiring endodontic canal treatment were recruited by probability random sampling into two groups based on irrigation protocols used during endodontic treatment: conventional needle and endo activator irrigation system. The post-operative pain of patients was recorded via a telephone call at 6 hours, 24 hours, and at 7 days on the visual analogue scale (VAS).
详细描述
Adequate cleaning of root canal system, along with complete eradication of infected, necrotic pulp remnants, persistent microorganisms, and complete sealing of root canal space is key to successful root canal treatment. Activated irrigation is a method that is used to agitate and increase efficacy of irrigant flow to irregularities of root canal spaces as lateral canals and isthmus by chemo-mechanical or various other energy forms and it is one of the irrigation methods used in this study. It has been shown that EndoActivatorTM system produces the effectual irrigation in all spaces of root canal including as lateral canals, isthmuses and the chances of extrusion of irrigant is less than that compared by means of conventional irrigation methods.Thirty seconds use of activated irrigation solution appeared to be more effective in disinfecting root canal compared with an standard irrigation regimen. The most relevant preferred method of activating the irrigant is by using a non-cutting oscillating ultrasonic tip.
NaOCl is the widely used irrigation solution during chemo-mechanical instrumentation as it has a broad range of antibacterial effect and a high capacity of organic tissue dissolution. It has the dissolution capacity when used in concentrations as low as 2.5%, resulting in decreased antibiofilm effect and removal of organic part of smear layer. Similarly, use of EDTA during the preparation removes the organic part of smear layer resulting in exposure of dentinal tubule and for better penetration of NaOCl for disinfection.1 The same protocol and irrigation techniques were followed in our study to maximize the benefit of NaOCl and EDTA during endodontic treatment.
Many studies have examined effects of different various irrigation methods in relation with endodontic procedures on post-operative pain that corroborate with results of this current study. In this study, working length was determined by use of apex locator i.e. electronic measurement device for root canal length which was then confirmed by digital radiograph. This protocol was followed to ensure that preparation was confined within root canal space, and prevent chances of over instru¬mentation that is considered to be one of those major leading cause of post-operative pain.
The Endoactivator System results in minimal extrusion of irritants and irrigate simulated lateral canals at 4.5 and 2 mm from desired working length as compare to that with conventional methods resulting in better irrigation and decreased post-operative pain among different variables.The highest values of post-operative pain were recorded after 6 hours of treatment that potentially decreased in the follow-up periods until almost disappeared after the time interval of one week. In studies evaluation regarding duration of post-operative pain after root canal treatment was noted in regard with above mentioned aggrement.
Studies by Gondim et al and Topçuoğlu et al also reported lower values of pain in Endovac group com¬pared to conventional needle irrigation showing sig¬nificantly marked results after 6 hours followed by 48 hours-time interval. The chances of extrusion of debris apically was greater resulting in increased level of pain with conventional needle-syringe irrigation due to positive pressure of conventional irrigation.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •complaints of pain in the maxillary or mandibular single rooted teeth requiring root canal treatment.
- •Patients not taking any sedative or analgesics medication 48 hours prior to presenting to the dental clinic
- •The teeth that were included were tender to percussion and palpation but had a sound periodontium and no inflammatory exudate or pus drainage.
排除标准
- •Patients with any systemic diseases,
- •retreatment cases,
- •or teeth with calcified canals were excluded
结局指标
主要结局
Comparison of post-operative pain after use of Endo-activator and conventional irrigation during endodontic treatment in symptomatic periapical periodontitis: a randomized control trial.
时间窗: 6 hours, 24 hours, and at 7 days
Introduction: The adequate removal of microorganisms, infected or necrotic pulp tissues and complete adequate seal of root canal system along with debridement is key to success of endodontic treatment. The objective of this study was to compare frequency of pain after using Endo Activator and conventional irrigation in patients presenting with symptomatic periapical periodontitis following endodontic treatment by means of Visual Analog Scale. Methods: This study was designed as single blind, randomized control trial .Sixty patients with symptomatic teeth requiring endodontic canal treatment were recruited by probability random sampling into two groups based on irrigation protocols used during endodontic treatment: conventional needle and endo activator irrigation system. The post-operative pain of patients was recorded via a telephone call at 6 hours, 24 hours, and at 7 days on the visual analogue scale (VAS).
Endoactivator
时间窗: The patients were contacted via telephone after 6 hours, 24 hours and 7 days to ask and record their postoperative pain on visual analogue scale that consist of 10cm line anchored by 1 denoting mild and 10 being most severe.
conventional endodontic needle 4 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was delivered into pulp chamber and then an Endoactivator tip (size #15.02) (DENTSPLY/ Tulsa Dental Specialties, OK) was placed loosely 2 mm short of working length, and activated at 20000 Hz in each canal, moving in a constant in and out motion. The NaOCl was agitated for one minute with approximately 2-3 mm vertical strokes.
Conventional irrigation
时间窗: The patients were contacted via telephone after 6 hours, 24 hours and 7 days to ask and record their postoperative pain on visual analogue scale that consist of 10cm line anchored by 1 denoting mild and 10 being most severe.
by placing the needle 2 mm short of desired working length, 4 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was placed into each canal for 40 secs with an approximate flow rate of 0.1 mL/s.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Soha Pirzado
Principle Investigator
Jinnah Sindh Medical University
