The accuracy of the non-invasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring that is adjusted with perfusion index: A method comparison study.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Patients who are undergoing to the planed hepatectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy with general anesthesia
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000024824
- Lead Sponsor
- Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine
- Brief Summary
Compared with the case of PI>1, the adjusted SD of bias in the case of PI<=1 was 1.4 times (95% confidence interval; 1.3 to 1.4) in systolic arterial pressure, 1.5 times (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 1.6) in diastolic arterial pressure, and 1.3 times (95% confidence interval 1.2-1.5) in mean arterial pressure.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
(1)body weight < 40 or >180 kg, BMI > 35kg/m2 (2)History of Raynaud syndrome and related diseases (3)Hystory of atrial fibrillation (4)History of the brachial vascular surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method