MedPath

Olanzapine Versus Midazolam for Agitation

Terminated
Conditions
Agitation,Psychomotor
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT03899506
Lead Sponsor
Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute
Brief Summary

The goal of this research investigation is to conduct a prospective observation of the comparative efficacy of midazolam versus olanzapine for the treatment of acute undifferentiated agitation in the emergency department.

Detailed Description

The goal of this research investigation is to conduct a prospective observation of the comparative efficacy of midazolam versus olanzapine for the treatment of acute undifferentiated agitation in the emergency department.

In the summer of 2017, the ED implemented a treatment protocol as a quality improvement initiative. The investigators performed observational research on this protocol and identified that haloperidol and ziprasidone were inferior to midazolam and olanzapine for treating agitation in our Department.

The comparison between olanzapine and midazolam, however, was inconclusive. It is possible that this is due to inadequate power, so the question of whether olanzapine or midazolam is superior is still unknown.

Because the department continues to strive to achieve the best care for this patient population, in the Summer of 2018 the ED is going to initiate a second ED treatment protocol of olanzapine and midazolam, based on the results of our 2017 protocol.

All patients requiring chemical sedation for will receive olanzapine as the initial treatment for agitation for 6 weeks, followed by midazolam as the initial treatment for agitation for 6 weeks. These patients will be observed by research staff.

This is a clinical care quality improvement protocol. The clinical protocol is not research. The research component is the observation of this clinical care protocol.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
206
Inclusion Criteria
  • Emergency Department patients
  • Patients 18 years and older
  • Patients with acute undifferentiated agitation requiring chemical sedation at the discretion of the attending emergency physician will be observed.

Patients meeting these criteria who receive medications in the ED will be observed by research staff, evaluating efficacy and safety of the administered medication.

Exclusion Criteria
  • There are no exclusion criteria per se as this is only observational research. The decision to administer the medication is at the discretion of the physician. Research protocols are only such that we are observing the efficacy and safety, which coincides the quality improvement purposes of this clinical protocol. Patients will be provided an Information Sheet and can opt to have their data removed.

Patients who are prisoners, children, will NOT have their data collected

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
OlanzapineOlanzapinePatients receiving 10 mg IM Olanzapine per the ED protocol
MidazolamMidazolamPatients receiving 5 mg IM Midazolam per the ED protocol
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proportion of Patients Adequately Sedated at 15 minutes15 minutes

Proportion of patients who achieve an AMSS score of \< 1 at 15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proportion of Patients Adequately Sedated at 30 minutes30 minutes

Proportion of patients who achieve an AMSS score of \< 1 at 30 minutes

Proportion of Patients Adequately Sedated at 60 minutes60 minutes

Proportion of patients who achieve an AMSS score of \< 1 at 60 minutes

Proportion of Patients Adequately Sedated at 120 minutes120 minutes

Proportion of patients who achieve an AMSS score of \< 1 at 120 minutes

Safety Events120 minutes

Proportion of patients who experience respiratory depression, hypotension, extrapyramidal side effects

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hennepin County Medical Center

🇺🇸

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath