Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04236687
NCT04236687UnknownNot Applicable

Prospective, Controlled Investigation of Prostate Artery Embolization Compared to Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital2 sites in 1 country100 target enrollmentStarted: February 1, 2020Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
100
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Improvement of symptoms assessed by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate improvement of symptoms from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) as assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) for prostate artery embolization (PAE) with microspheres (Embozene™, 400µm) compared to conventional Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

Detailed Description

This is a prospective randomized controlled study that collects data of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia that are treated with prostatic artery embolization (PAE) or with Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). For PAE a catheter is placed in the prostate artery, a fluid containing thousands of tiny particles (microspheres) is injected through the catheter into these small arteries which nourish the prostate. The injected microspheres will slow the blood flow to the prostate. For HoLEP a Holmium laser will be used to enucleate the prostatic hyperplasia trough the urethra. Clinical follow-up include clinical visit after 1, 6 and 12 months. Acute as well as long term complications will be recorded. The patients fill in the questionnaires for urologic disease. Urodynamic examination will record functional outcome.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
45 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients evaluated in the urology department and candidates to surgical treatment
  • Age > 45 years
  • IPSS ≥ 10
  • Maximum urinary flow < 12 milliliters (mL)/second (s)
  • Post-void residual urinary volume < 300mL
  • Prostatic volume between 20mL and 250mL assessed by ultrasound
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • PSA > 10 (if not negative prostate biopsy)
  • Life expectancy below 1 year
  • Renal insufficiency defined as Glomerular Filtration Rate < 30 ml/min/1,73m2
  • Known severe reactions to iodine-based contrast or gadolinium-based contrast
  • CT examination reveals no access to the prostate arteries.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Improvement of symptoms assessed by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months after procedure

Change in prostatic symptoms using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). IPSS score goes from 0 to 35. Higher values mean worse outcome (prostate symptons)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Maximum urinary flow(Baseline to 6 months after procedure)
  • Post-void residual urinary volume(Baseline to 6 months after procedure)
  • Prostate specific antigen (PSA)(Baseline to 6 months after procedure)
  • Procedure related adverse events(Baseline to 6 months after procedure)
  • Procedure related effects on sexual function(Baseline to 6 months after procedure)
  • Procedure related effects on urinary continence(Baseline to 6 months after procedure)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials