跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04370951
NCT04370951Unknown不适用

Efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block for Quality of Recovery in Posterior Thoraco-Lumbar Spinal Decompression Surgery: A Randomised Control Trial

Mater Misericordiae University Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2020年5月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
50
试验地点
2
主要终点
QoR 15 score

研究概览

简要总结

Spinal Surgery can be associated with significant post operative pain. This can be a considerable source of morbidity, resulting in a longer duration of in- hospital stay and increasing opiate requirements. As a result the patient experiences a more arduous recovery process.

Recently a new form of Regional Anaesthesia has been described for patients undergoing Spinal surgery. The Erector Spinae Plane Block involves depositing Local Anaesthetic under Ultra Sound guidance on top of the Transverse Process of the Spine and deep to the Erector Spinae Muscle. Patients who have had this procedure report lower pain scores and have a lesser opiate requirement in the post operative period.

详细描述

This study will test the hypothesis that patients receiving ESP Block have higher QoR-15 scores and better post operative analgesia in comparison with patients receiving standard care after Spinal Surgery.

Objectives & endpoints / outcome measures

  1. The Primary outcome in this study will be the patient centred QoR-15 score among ESB and Control patients;

  2. Secondary outcomes will be:

  3. Area under the VRS pain score versus time (24 hr post-op);

  4. VRS pain scores at 1 hr, 4 hr, 12 hr, 24 hr postop;

  5. time to administration of first rescue analgesia after the block;

  6. documentation of adverse events : hypotension, pruritus, nausea and vomiting

  7. DAH -30 Days at home at 30 Days

Proposed sample size The established minimum clinically important difference in QoR-15 is 8.0 and the SD of QoR-15 scores after major surgery is in the order of 10 [range of QoR score is 1-150]. Therefore, assuming Type I error = 0.05 and Type II error = 0.2 (80% power to detect this difference), then n=25 patients needed in each group.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Male and Female participants providing written informed consent, ASA grade 1- 4, age group 18 and over undergoing Posterior approach Spinal surgery involving 2 or more levels of decompression in the lumbar or thoracic regions.

排除标准

  • Absence of informed written consent, pre existing infection at block site, severe coagulopathy, allergy to local anaesthesia, , previous history of opiate abuse, pre existing chronic pain condition, pre-existing dementia [because of need to co-operate in completing QoR-15 score day after surgery], decompression involving cervical levels of vertebrae, decompression due to queried or confirmed malignancy

结局指标

主要结局

QoR 15 score

时间窗: 24 hours post operatively

a objective assessment of quality of recovery post surgery

次要结局

  • AUC of VRS Pain score versus time(24 hours post op)
  • time to administration of first rescue analgesia after the block(24 hours post op)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dylan Finnerty

Clinical Lecturer in Anaesthesia

Mater Misericordiae University Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane Block in... | 临床试验