跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02657044
NCT02657044Unknown不适用

Multicenter, Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) And Endoscopic Submucosal dissecTIon (ESD) for Resection of Large Distal Non-pedunculated Colorectal Adenomas (MATILDA-trial)

UMC Utrecht1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 212 人开始时间: 2016年4月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
UMC Utrecht
入组人数
212
试验地点
1
主要终点
Recurrence rate at follow-up colonoscopy after 6 months

研究概览

简要总结

Endoscopic resection of adenomas in the colon is the cornerstone of effective colorectal cancer prevention. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is currently the most used technique for resection of large distal colorectal adenomas, however, maintains some important limitations. In large lesions, EMR can often only be performed in a piecemeal fashion resulting in relatively low R0-resection rates and high recurrence rates. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a newer procedure that is more difficult resulting in a longer procedural time, but is promising due to the high en-bloc resection rates and the very low recurrence rates. The aim of this multicenter randomized study is to compare EMR and ESD with regard to recurrence rates and radical (R0) resection rates, and to put this into perspective against the costs and complication rates of both strategies and the burden perceived by patients on the long term-term.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •non-pedunculated polyp larger than 20 mm in the rectum, sigmoid or descending colon found during colonoscopy
  • •indication for endoscopic treatment
  • •≥18 years old
  • •Written informed consent

排除标准

  • •suspicion of malignancy, as determined by endoscopic findings (invasive Kudo pit pattern, Hiroshima type C) or proven malignancy at histology
  • •prior endoscopic resection attempt
  • •presence of synchronous distal advanced carcinoma that requires surgical resection
  • •the risk exceeds the benefit of endoscopic treatment, such as patient's with an extremely poor general condition or a very short life expectancy
  • •the inability to provide informed consent

研究组 & 干预措施

EMR

Active Comparator

In the EMR-arm, endoscopic resection will be performed using the (p)EMR technique.

干预措施: EMR (Procedure)

ESD

Active Comparator

In the ESD-arm, endoscopic resection will be performed using the (h)ESD technique.

干预措施: ESD (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Recurrence rate at follow-up colonoscopy after 6 months

时间窗: 6 months

Observed from resected residual disease or, if not present, from biopsies of the scar

次要结局

  • Long-term recurrence rate at follow-up colonoscopy after 36 months(36 months)
  • Health care resource utilization and consts(36 months)
  • Perceived burden and quality of life among patients(36 months)
  • Complication rate(30 days)
  • Surgical referral rate(36 months)
  • R0-resection rate(30 days)

研究者

发起方
UMC Utrecht
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

L.M.G. Moons

dr. L.M.G. Moons, Principal Investigator

UMC Utrecht

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

EMR Versus ESD for Resection of Large Distal... | 临床试验