Computerized, Patient-entered Medical Histories for Managing Chest Pain in the Emergency Department
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中(未招募)
- 入组人数
- 2,000
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- A correct diagnosis of an acute coronary syndrome by use of computer-assisted patient entered history or standard history obtained by the cardiologist in attendance
研究概览
简要总结
The aim is to determine the additional value of computerized, patient-entered medical histories for the management of patients presenting at the emergency department with chest pain.
详细描述
The purpose of this study is to determine the value of a detailed medical history, acquired by computer-directed, patient self-entry of data, for efficient disposition of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain and non-diagnostic first ECG and/or serum markers for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The research questions posed are: will the added data and systems-based analysis of the data provided by computerization of these processes, as compared with routine physician-acquired histories and analysis; (1) safely risk stratify patients with chest pain, and (2) save time and resources?
Computerized, patient-entered histories will be collected with the software program CLEOS running on tablets (iPad®, Apple Inc, Cupertino, California, USA). The histories to be collected include demographic data, present illness, systems review, past medical history, prescription drugs, previous adverse drug reactions, social history, life-style risks, and family history. Histories will be collected during wait times in the ED, e.g., before patients are seen by a physician and while patients wait for reports of laboratory data collected by routine care.
Data acquired by CLEOS will be related to clinical outcomes in the acute setting and at 30 days and 1 year post-presentation for patients without documented ACS in the acute setting. Outcomes for all patients will be extracted from hospital records and national registries.
For the validation and future development of CLEOS, interviews with patients for the evaluation of patient experience regarding feasibility, acceptance, comprehensiveness and technical aspects of answering the CLEOS interview will take place within one to three months after the ED visit.
This is an exploratory study in which the calculation of the number of participating patients is based on the desired precision of sensitivity and specificity. Assuming that the prevalence is 0.5 (50 %), a power calculation with nQuery® version 7.0 (Statistical Solutions Ltd, Boston, Massachusetts, USA) shows that with 1000 patients the estimated precision of sensitivity and specificity is ±0.03 (3 %). The more the extreme the result, i.e. sensitivity or specificity approaching 0 or 1 (100 %), the higher the precision. The models will be developed in the first 50% of the data acquired (training data set) and validated in the last 50% of the data acquired (validation data set). We also intend to make estimates in subgroups. To ascertain that such estimates can be done, an even larger number of patients must be recruited. Thus, the study intends to recruit data from approximately 2000 patients.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Chest pain recorded by a triage nurse or registrar
- •Fluency in Swedish or English
- •Non-diagnostic first ECG and/or serum markers
- •Manchester triage 2-5
- •Informed consent
排除标准
- •Inability to carry out computerized history-taking on the dedicated device
结局指标
主要结局
A correct diagnosis of an acute coronary syndrome by use of computer-assisted patient entered history or standard history obtained by the cardiologist in attendance
时间窗: 7 days
The primary objective is to determine whether the use of computer-assisted patient entered history is better than a standard history obtained by the cardiologist in attendance for the prediction and safe exclusion of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the acute setting in patients with non-diagnostic ECG and/or serum markers. Thus, the primary endpoint is the comparison between the two methods for the proportion of patients with a correct diagnosis of ACS or not ACS in the acute setting, The diagnosis of ACS or not ACS is defined as a validated clinical endpoint within 7 days
次要结局
- The ability of computer-assisted patient entered history, as compared to standard history obtained by the cardiologist in attendance to provide information required to calculate a TIMI risk score for an ACS.(7 and 30 days)
- A correct exclusion of an acute coronary syndrome up to 30 days by use of computer-assisted patient entered history or standard history obtained by the cardiologist in attendance(30 days)
- A correct exclusion of an acute coronary syndrome up to 1 year by use of computer-assisted patient entered history or standard history obtained by the cardiologist in attendance(1 year)
- Direct costs for a patient with a diagnosis of an acute coronary syndrome when patient selection is based on computer-assisted patient entered history, as compared to standard history obtained by the cardiologist in attendance(1 year)
- Patient experience with computer-assisted patient entered history measured as he proportion of patients who complete a computer-assisted patient entered history(7 days)
研究者
Thomas Kahan
Professor
Karolinska Institutet
