MedPath

Effect of Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Trapezius Trigger Point

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Trigger Points
Registration Number
NCT07045324
Lead Sponsor
Bahçeşehir University
Brief Summary

This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) compared to ischemic compression (trigger point massage) and exercise in treating trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle. Ninety participants aged 18-55 with at least two trigger points were randomly assigned to three groups: nVNS, ischemic compression, or exercise (control). Interventions were administered over 10 sessions (3 times per week). Outcomes included pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), trigger point number, pain pressure threshold (algometer), neck function (Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale, KBFÖS), well-being (WHO-5 Well-Being Index), and functional mobility. The nVNS group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in all outcomes compared to the other groups (p \< 0.05).

Detailed Description

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is characterized by trigger points-hyperirritable spots in skeletal muscle associated with pain, stiffness, and reduced function. The upper trapezius muscle is a common site for trigger points, contributing to neck pain and disability. Traditional treatments include ischemic compression and exercise, but non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) has emerged as a promising modality due to its ability to modulate pain pathways and autonomic function.

This study investigated whether nVNS is more effective than ischemic compression or exercise in reducing pain and improving function in patients with trapezius trigger points. Participants were randomized into three groups (n=30 each)

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
90
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age 18-55 years.
  • Presence of at least two trigger points (active or latent) in the upper trapezius muscle, confirmed by palpation.
  • Ability to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
  • History of cervical spine surgery or trauma.
  • Neurological disorders (e.g., epilepsy, stroke).
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Use of pacemakers or other implanted electrical devices.
  • Active infection or skin lesions at the stimulation site.
  • Recent use of botulinum toxin or other trigger point injections.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain Pressure Threshold (Algometer)Measurements were taken pre- and post-intervention. (week 4)

Measured using a digital algometer (kg/cm²) at trigger point sites to assess pain sensitivity.

Pain Intensity (VAS)(Visual Analog Scale )Baseline and post-intervention (week 4)

Measured using the Visual Analog Scale (0-10 ), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain.

Number of Trigger pointsMeasurements were taken pre- and post-intervention.(week 4)

Count of active and latent trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle, assessed by palpation.

Neck Function (CNFDS(Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability)Measurements were taken pre- and post-intervention. (week 4)

Assessed using the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale, evaluating neck-related disability (0-30, higher scores indicate greater disability).

WHO-5(World Health Organization-Five Well-Bing Index)Measurements were taken pre- and post-intervention. (week 4)

Description: Measured using the WHO-5 Well-Being Index, a 5-item scale (0-25, higher scores indicate better well-being)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Bahçeşehir University, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

🇹🇷

İstanbul, Helthy, Turkey

Bahçeşehir University, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
🇹🇷İstanbul, Helthy, Turkey

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.