Microcurrent Treatment for Chronic Debilitating Pain
- Conditions
- PainOpioid Use
- Interventions
- Procedure: Standard treatment + Microcurrent TherapyProcedure: Standard treatment + placebo
- Registration Number
- NCT04011176
- Lead Sponsor
- Paul Crawford
- Brief Summary
To compare the efficacy of standard pain treatment and placebo (a microcurrent faux treatment) as opposed to standard pain treatment and microcurrent therapy in any primary care patients over a three month period.
- Detailed Description
This study is not intended to be definitive and should be considered an exploratory randomized trial to determine conditions for which microcurrent is more effective. Thus, extensive subgroup analyses will be performed so that definitive trials can be developed. This is a single-blind study where subjects will not know if they are receiving microcurrent treatment.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 200
- Male and female Active Duty members and DoD beneficiaries
- Age 18 years or older
- Chronic debilitating pain
- PROMIS-57 T score is 60 or above
- Pregnant
- Implanted pacemaker
- Spinal cord stimulator
- Illicit drug use including marijuana use
- Epilepsy or a history of seizures
- Other implanted device (e.g., insulin pump, opioid pump, or defibrillator)
- Chronic debilitating pain referred or recruited as measured by PROMIS-57 T score is below 60
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Standard treatment + Microcurrent Therapy Standard treatment + Microcurrent Therapy 100-300µA microcurrent delivered for 20-300 minutes, once a week for 6 weeks Standard treatment + placebo Standard treatment + placebo Placing the microcurrent pads on the patient but not turning on the microcurrent box for 30 minutes once a week for 6 weeks
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP) POST-TREATMENT: time 6 (week 12) MYMOP measures the outcomes that the patient considers the most important.On follow-up questionnaires the wording of the previously chosen items is unchanged.
Produces a 7-point scale (0=as good as it could be, 6=as bad as it could be) for individual items of Symptoms, Activity, and Wellbeing as well as the MYMOP profile scorePatient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) -57 Profile standardized T-Scores SCREENING PROMIS-57 is a collection of 8-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item.
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) POST-TREATMENT: time 6 (week 6) The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VHA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Opioids taken screening, time 0 (week 0), time 1 (week 1), time 2 (week 2), time 3 (week 3), time 4 (week 4), time 5 (week 5), time 6 (week 12) Opioids taken measured in morphine equivalent units (MEU; milligrams)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Mike O'Callaghan Military Medical Center
🇺🇸Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, United States