Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02404467
NCT02404467
Completed
Not Applicable

Feasibility And Safety of Early Discharge After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The FAST-TAVI Study

Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin10 sites in 3 countries502 target enrollmentJanuary 2015
ConditionsAortic Stenosis

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Aortic Stenosis
Sponsor
Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin
Enrollment
502
Locations
10
Primary Endpoint
Feasibility and safety of early discharge after transfemoral (TF) TAVI (cumulative incidence of death, hospitalization, complications)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The hypothesis behind this study is that there is a proportion of patients considered high or intermediate risk for surgery, but relatively low risk for TAVI, which can be discharged early after the procedure (within the first 2-3 days) without additional risks. Therefore, when performed in safety, an early discharge may cut periprocedural TAVI costs significantly.

Detailed Description

TAVI (Transcatheter aortic valve Implantation) - A viable alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Considered as being at unacceptable surgical risk. Despite its widespread utilization, there are procedure specific complications and hospitalization associated costs that limit TAVI expansion into patient populations with lower risk. Cost-effectiveness of TAVI has been investigated either compared with standard therapy for patients who are not candidates for surgical valve replacement or with conventional surgical replacement in high-risk patients. Formal economic evaluation in inoperable patients demonstrated that the benefits of TAVI were achieved at an acceptable incremental cost to society, at least in the context of the U.S. and U.K. health systems. In patients with severe, symptomatic AS who are at high but not prohibitive surgical risk, the PARTNER A trial demonstrated that TAVI appeared to be an economically attractive strategy compared with aortic valve replacement, provided that patients are suitable for a transfemoral approach. On the other hand, results for trans-apical TAVI compared with surgical replacement were economically unfavorable.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 2015
End Date
July 2019
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Beyond the applicable criteria of the IFU no further in- and exclusion criteria are defined.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Feasibility and safety of early discharge after transfemoral (TF) TAVI (cumulative incidence of death, hospitalization, complications)

Time Frame: 30 days after intervention

Cumulative incidence of a combination of all cause death, vascular Access related complications permanent Pacemaker Implantation, re-hospitalization due to cardiac reasons, and Major bleeding complications from day 4 to 30 after TAVI.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Relative costs of TAVI including hospitalization in either stratum compared to the LR / ED group(1 year)
  • Stratified Analysis of the cumulative incidence of a combination of the Primary outcome measures according to Patient risk factors and discharge date(30 days after intervention)
  • Length-of-Stay after TAVI in days(1 year)

Study Sites (10)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials