Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02232867
NCT02232867
Unknown
Not Applicable

Adjunct Locomotor Training to Improve Walking Ability After Stroke

University of Victoria1 site in 1 country20 target enrollmentJuly 2011
ConditionsStroke

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Stroke
Sponsor
University of Victoria
Enrollment
20
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in Treadmill Walking Characteristics
Last Updated
11 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

It has been found that arm and leg cycling is similar to walking in terms of the muscle activation patterns and joint ranges of motion. In addition, arm and leg cycling and walking activate similar neural pathways. Another advantage of arm and leg cycling is that it involves coordination of all four limbs in a rhythmic movement. This may be particularly beneficial given previous findings that arm movement contributes to the activation of leg muscles during walking in humans. This is achieved with interconnected neural pathways that link the arms to the legs. These neural interlimb connections remain intact in stroke victims, such that maximizing the contribution of the arms to the legs may increase coordination for walking. Thus, the objectives of this research are to determine if arm and leg cycling can be used to increase the strength of interlimb connections and if this helps to improve walking ability in a post-stroke population. It is hypothesized that arm and leg cycling will transfer to improvements in walking in a post stroke population.

Detailed Description

For those who have suffered a stroke, damage to the brain can result in a decreased ability to walk, thus decreasing quality of life in a significant way. Traditionally, body weight supported treadmill training has been used for walking rehabilitation; however, this therapy requires specialized technicians, equipment, and facilities. Arm and leg cycle ergometers, a device commonly found in a gym, could provide an inexpensive and readily accessible means for walking rehabilitation.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 2011
End Date
March 2015
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr. E. Paul Zehr

Dr. E. Paul Zehr

University of Victoria

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • lives within the Victoria, Vancouver Island, and Vancouver mainland communities

Exclusion Criteria

  • inability to stand for 5 minutes unassisted

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Treadmill Walking Characteristics

Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (average of 4 days following last exercise session)

Treadmill walking characteristics will be gauged via a customized analysis of muscle activity patterns and lower limb joint kinematics. Walking frequency, symmetry, and timing will also be analyzed

Secondary Outcomes

  • Six minute walk test(Baseline, immediately post-intervention (average of 4 days following last exercise session))
  • Fugl-Meyer Assessment(Baseline, immediately post-intervention (average of 4 days following the last exercise session))
  • Brunnstrom recovery stages(Baseline, immediately post-intervention (average of 4 days following the last exercise session))
  • Timed up and go test(Baseline, immediately post-intervention (average of 4 days following the last exercise session))
  • Interlimb Connections(Baseline, immediately post-intervention (average of 4 days following the last exercise session))
  • 10 meter walk test(Baseline, immediately post-intervention (average of 4 days following the last exercise session))

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials