Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01874899
NCT01874899
Completed
Not Applicable

Prospective Randomized Feasibility Study Comparing Manual vs. Automatic Position-Adaptive Spinal Cord Stimulation With Surgical Leads

Justin Parker Neurological Institute1 site in 1 country18 target enrollmentJune 2013

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Chronic Refractory Low Back and Leg Pain
Sponsor
Justin Parker Neurological Institute
Enrollment
18
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Stimulation amplitude changes in response to postural changes
Status
Completed
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The main purpose of this study is to establish the extent that chronic pain patients implanted with surgical, laminectomy-type, leads experience position-related variation in spinal cord stimulation therapy and to investigate the effects of manual versus automatic position-adaptive spinal cord stimulation on clinical outcome.

Detailed Description

A single-center, prospective, randomized study with a two-arm crossover design. The primary objective of this study is to establish threshold and therapeutic stimulation parameters for the RestoreSensor neurostimulator in response to postural changes. The secondary objective is to compare the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation with manual versus automatic position-adaptive settings for chronic refractory low back and/or extremity pain.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 2013
End Date
December 2017
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Alan T. Villavicencio, MD

Principle Investigator

Justin Parker Neurological Institute

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Skeletally mature adults between 18 and 70 years old
  • Patients with chronic refractory back and/or leg pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome, post-laminectomy pain, radicular pain syndrome or radiculopathy refractory to conservative and surgical interventions
  • \> 50% pain reduction during the trail period
  • Willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol including follow-up requirements
  • Willing to sign a study specific informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous SCS treatment
  • Surgically remediable spinal condition
  • Active local or systemic infection

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Stimulation amplitude changes in response to postural changes

Time Frame: 6 months

Threshold and therapeutic stimulation parameters in different postures: lying right, lying left, lying prone, lying supine, upright and upright active will be collected for manual and sensor-driven position-adaptive stimulation.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Sleep quality improvement(6 months)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials