跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02444520
NCT02444520已完成不适用

Persistent Physical Symptoms Reduction Intervention: a Systems Change and Evaluation (PRINCE) - Integrated GP Care for Persistent Physical Symptoms: a Feasibility & Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial

King's College London2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 161 人开始时间: 2015年5月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
161
试验地点
2
主要终点
Feasibility: Follow-up rates and response rates to questionnaires (Sent questionnaires v completed questionnaires received at 12 and 24 weeks).

研究概览

简要总结

PRINCE primary is cluster randomised waiting list controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility of an integrated approach to care in general practice for adults with persistent physical symptoms (PPS). PPS is defined as physical symptoms with no obvious underlying organic. 240 patients with PPS recruited from 8-12 GP practices in London will be randomised to the integrated care approach plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. The integrated GP approach consists of providing GPs with a short cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) skills training, ongoing supervision, as well as written and audio-visual materials/guidelines. In addition, participants randomised to the intervention group will receive tailored CBT-based self-help materials (i.e. written and audio-visual materials).

详细描述

Patients with PPS are often severely functionally impaired and. They consume large amounts of healthcare and welfare benefits. There is an accumulating body of evidence showing that cognitive behavioural interventions can reduce levels of symptoms and improve overall functioning in patients with PPS. CBT has demonstrated both short-term and long-term efficacy with small to medium effect sizes for PPS. Larger treatment effects have been reported for specific PPS syndromes, including non-cardiac chest pain, Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS).

General practitioners (GPs) play a major role in identifying and managing patients with PPS. A previous randomised parallel group pilot trial investigated the feasibility (i.e. recruitment, retention and acceptability) of implementing a primary care Symptoms Clinic for patients with PPS). The Symptoms Clinic comprised a structured set of consultations delivered by a specially trained GP with a strong interest in PPS. The intervention included exploring potential biological mechanisms underlying the PPS condition, empathetic support, and training patients in symptom-management (i.e. medication or cognitive behavioural techniques). The results indicated that the Symptoms Clinic was acceptable to the majority of patients randomised to the intervention group, and may have the potential to generate clinically significant benefits. However, this pilot study did not assess feasibility parameters referring to GPs' willingness to participate in the study and undergo specialised psychological training. Moreover, the intervention was carried out by only one GP, raising questions about the generalizability of the study.

Managing patients with PPS can be highly challenging in general practice. Although GPs recognise the treatment of PPS as a responsibility of primary care, previous studies show that GPs often feel powerless, frustrated and helpless when encountering these patients. Furthermore, GPs frequently report that factors such as time constraints and the lack of psychological training prevents them from effectively addressing patients' psychosocial needs and developing appropriate doctor-patient communication skills.

The aim of this study is to assess whether it is feasible to conduct an adequately powered future trial to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a CBT-based integrated GP care approach for treating patients with PPS (please refer to arms and interventions for more details).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Other
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Patients and GPs will not be blind to treatment allocation due to the nature of the trial (i.e. therapy trial). The trial team member responsible for treatment allocation will be unblind. All outcome data are based on self-report and will be collected either by post or email. The research assistant(s) responsible for contacting participants who have not returned or completed follow-up questionnaires will be unblind. Moreover, the Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee (DMEC), research workers and trial statisticians will remain blind to treatment allocation.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Integrated GP Care

Experimental
  • GP training in utilising cognitive behavioural skills during 10-minute consultations;
  • GP Supervision;
  • Audio-visual and written materials/guidelines for GP's;
  • Copies of self-help materials for patients;• Integrated case management discussion prior to secondary care referral. GPs will be encouraged to consult with a colleague before making a referral;
  • Booklets for patients once consent gained.

干预措施: Integrated GP Care (Behavioral)

Waiting List Control Group

No Intervention

Patients in the waiting list control group will continue to receive treatment as usual (TAU), and will be crossed over to receive 'Integrated GP Care' at 6 months post randomization.

结局指标

主要结局

Feasibility: Follow-up rates and response rates to questionnaires (Sent questionnaires v completed questionnaires received at 12 and 24 weeks).

时间窗: 24 weeks post randomization

The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".

Feasibility: Rate of eligible trial participants (Consort). The number of patients per practice that are initially screened for eligibility and the number per practice meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

时间窗: 24 weeks post randomization

The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".

Feasibility: Availability of data required and the usefulness and limitations of GP databases assessed qualitatively

时间窗: 24 weeks post randomization

The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".

Feasibility: Willingness of GP practices to be consent and be randomized as assessed by No. of eligible GP practices agreed consent v No. of GP practices not agreed to consent

时间窗: 24 weeks post randomization

The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".

Feasibility: Willingness of patients to use the provided material given in 'integrated GP care' (self-help material).

时间窗: 24 weeks post randomization

The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".

Feasibility: Willingness of participants to be consented and randomised (No. of positive reply slips received V No. of patients agreed to be screened, No. of eligible patients agreed consent v No. of eligible patients not agreed to consent)

时间窗: 24 weeks post randomization

The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".

Feasibility: Willingness of clinicians to participate in the study (proportion of GPs that register within the study out of the GPs that are registered with the eligible practice)

时间窗: 24 weeks post randomization

The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".

Feasibility: Willingness of practices and participants to be contacted about the study (Number (No.) of reply slips sent via the post to ask if the practice/participants would like to participate further information v No. of reply slips received back)

时间窗: 24 weeks post randomization

The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".

Feasibility: Willingness of practices to be randomised (No. of eligible GP practices agreed consent v No. of GP practices not agreed to consent)

时间窗: 24 weeks post randomization

The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验