Comparison of Ultrasound and Classical Method for Left Double Lumen Tube Selection in One-Lung Ventilation: A Randomised Controlled Study

The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy and practicality of ultrasound in the selection of double lumen tube and whether the complications that may occur intraoperatively and postoperatively can be reduced.

In thoracic surgery, single lung ventilation is one of the most challenging airway and ventilation methods for anaesthetists. Bronchial blockers and double lumen tubes are the tools used to isolate the lung in single lung ventilation and double lumen tubes are used more frequently. Size is important when choosing a double lumen tube. There is no definite rule when choosing the tube size. When selecting the size of the double lumen tube, there is a classical method selected according to the gender and height of the patient. However, due to anatomical differences between individuals; inappropriate tube sizes may be selected and this may lead to consequences such as tracheabronchial injury and insufficient deflation of the lungs.

The use of ultrasound can provide rapid assessment of airway anatomy in the operating theatre, intensive care unit and emergency department. Ultrasound is a suitable tool for the evaluation of the subglottic airway confirmed by computed tomography. The use of ultrasound requires less training and the patient does not need to be fully immobilised and sedated. There is a correlation between the diameter of the external trachea measured by ultrasound just above the sternoclavicular junction and the diameter of the left main bronchus measured by computed tomography scan.

Patients aged 18-75 years with ASA 1-2-3 who give informed consent for left double lumen tube placement for single lung ventilation will be included in this study. Patients with a history of previous difficult intubation, head and neck surgery and radiotherapy, class 3-4 in the Colmark-Lehane classification by the thoracic anaesthetist who will perform the intubation, and patients with previously known hoarseness and chronic cough will not be included in the study. Patients who accept the study will be randomly assigned to one of the anaesthesia groups including ultrasound group (Group 1) and classical method (Group 2).

Randomisation will be in a 1:1 ratio and will be done by closed envelope method. A paper with the name of one of the two groups will be placed in the envelopes beforehand and the envelopes will be closed and mixed. For each patient, a closed envelope will be drawn randomly before the procedure and the procedures will be performed according to the group indicated on the paper.