Comparison between two types of Laryngeal mask airways in terms of the development of sore throat after its use
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: R50-R69- General symptoms and signs
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/08/044587
- Lead Sponsor
- Jawaharlal Institute of Post graduate Medical Education and Research
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
ASA 1and 2 patients
Elective surgery under general anaesthesia
lasting upto 2 hours.
Exclusion Criteria
Pregnant woman
Patients undergoing emergency surgery
Patients at risk of aspiration
Patients with history of sorethroat or URI upto 2 weeks prior to surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the incidence of sore throat between LMA Protector and LMA ProsealTimepoint: At 1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the device insertion time, success at first attempt insertion rates and ease of insertion in each <br/ ><br>device. <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>To compare the oropharyngeal seal pressure in each device. <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>To compare the ventilator parameters with each device <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>To compare the incidence of dysphagia, dysphonia, <br/ ><br>hoarseness of voice in each device.Timepoint: At 1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours