ISRCTN13534944已完成未知
Outpatient vs inpatient Foley catheter induction of labour in multiparous women: a randomised trial
niversity Malaya Medical Centre0 个研究点目标入组 163 人开始时间: 2019年1月11日最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 163
研究概览
简要总结
2021 Results article in https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14247 (added 01/09/2021)
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 性别
- Female
入选标准
- •1. Aged 18 years and above
- •2. Gestational age of > 37 weeks at enrolment
- •3. Scheduled induction of labour
- •4. Viable pregnancy
- •5. Cephalic presentation
- •6. Singleton pregnancy
- •7. Unfavourable cervix (Bishop Score = 5)
- •8. Intact membranes
- •9. Reassuring pre induction fetal cardiotocography (CTG)
- •Added 18/06/2019:
- •10. Must have their own transport and live within 30km of the hospital
排除标准
- •1. Allergic to latex
- •2. Nulliparous
- •3. Previous uterine scar (caesarean/myomectomy)
研究者
相似试验
进行中（未招募）
Unknown
Placing the Foley balloon catheter adjacent to the inner portion of the neck of the womb to induce labour in women at their first delivery followed by waiting in the hospital or at homeFoley balloon labour inductionPregnancy and ChildbirthISRCTN18100609niversity Malaya Medical Centre252
终止
不适用
Outpatient Foley Catheter Compared to Usual Inpatient Care for Labor InductionPregnancyNCT02546193Mayo Clinic39
已完成
不适用
Inpatient and Outpatient Balloon Catheter Cervical RipeningCaesarean Section InfectionNCT04342741National University of Malaysia60
已完成
4 期
Outpatient Foley catheter Vs inpatient Prostin gel for induction of labourACTRN12609000420246Royal Hospital for Women100
尚未招募
3 期
A comparative study between two methods of induction of labor pains, mechanical method (by insertion of Foley catheter) and chemical method ( by using dinoprostone gel) by inserting them in cervix of pregnant women .CTRI/2021/07/035072VMMC and SAFDARJUNG HOSPITA