Left Septal or Deep Septal Pacing to Prevent Pacing-induced Cardiomyopathy
- Conditions
- Complete Heart BlockSecond Degree Atrioventricular Block Möbitz Type II
- Registration Number
- NCT06474819
- Lead Sponsor
- Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge
- Brief Summary
Multicenter randomized controlled trial which will include patients with left ventricular ejection fraction \>50% requiring a first implant of a cardiac pacemaker with expected high pacing percentages.
Patients will be randomized 1:1 to right ventricular apical pacing vs left septal or deep septal pacing. The primary endpoint will be pacing-induced cardiomyopathy during the first year of follow-up.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 326
- First implant of a single-chamber or dual chamber pacemaker due to persistent bradycardia associated with high degree atrio-ventricular (AV) block (complete AV block or second degree type II AV block), with second-degree type I AV block (symptomatic or associated with intra-hisian or infra-hisian block), or with atrial fibrillation with symptomatic slow ventricular rate (<45lpm).
- LVEF>50% at echocardiography performed maximum 7 days before pacemaker implant.
- Informed consent signature.
- Life expectancy <12 months
- Severe cardiac valvular abnormality requiring intervention
- Unstable Angina, Acute myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, valvular surgery or valvular percutaneous intervention in the 90 days prior to pacemaker implant.
- Inclusion in another trial which may influence the results of this study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy 12 months Decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by \>10% as compared to the LVEF before pacemaker implant and final LVEF\<45%.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method LVEF during follow-up 12 months To compare the mean or median (depending on distribution) LVEF before and one year after pacemaker implant in the two groups.
heart failure 12 months Comparison of heart failure (HF) events in the first year after pacemaker implant in the two groups. HF events will be: hospitalizations for heart failure, emergency department or day-hospital visits for heart failure, heart failure symptoms requiring the initiation of diuretic therapy.
Mitral and tricuspid regurgitation 12 months To compare the degree of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation before and one year after pacemaker implant in the two groups.
Brain Natriuretic Peptide levels 12 months To compare the N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels one year after pacemaker implant in the two groups.
New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 12 months To compare the NYHA class one year after pacemaker implant in the two groups.
Trial Locations
- Locations (6)
Hospital Vall d'Hebrón
🇪🇸Barcelona, Spain
Hospital General Universitario de Castellón
🇪🇸Castellón De La Plana, Spain
Hospital Virgen de las Nieves
🇪🇸Granada, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge
🇪🇸Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
Hospital La Fe
🇪🇸Valencia, Spain
Hospital Lozano Blesa
🇪🇸Zaragoza, Spain
Hospital Vall d'Hebrón🇪🇸Barcelona, SpainRaquel Adeliño RecasensContact