跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06543654
NCT06543654已完成不适用

Evaluation of Template Assisted Monochromatic Structural Colored Versus Universal Multi-Shade Direct Composite Veneers

Tanta University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2022年7月19日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
20
试验地点
1
主要终点
Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline, six, nine, twelve, and eighteen months by two calibrated examiners using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of this study was to conduct a clinical trial utilizing a modified split-mouth, double-blinded, randomized strategy to clinically assess template assisted one shade structural colored versus universal multi-shade direct composite veneers

详细描述

The superior mechanical qualities, superb aesthetics, and versatility of resin-based composites (RBCs) make them popular choices for direct restorative applications. Compared to their predecessors, nanocomposites have shown superior qualities since nanotechnology was introduced in the production of dental RBCs.

A restoration's aesthetic integration is mostly the result of its chromatic characteristics. Pigments included in the composition of the restorative material typically control the selective reflection of wavelengths to emulate the natural tooth. In order to better reflect the broad color range that characterizes real dentition, RBCs have more recently employed the phenomena of "structural color" .

Thanks to the novel property of resins, color differences between the tooth and the restoration are eliminated or balanced out as perceived color of a region moves toward the color of the surrounding area . Additionally, as opposed to multi-shade RBCs, single-shade RBCs eliminate the need to select between various resin shades, streamlining the color choosing procedure and cutting down on time lost during the clinical resin selection process. The Vita Classic Shade Guide's shades can all be matched with these materials.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

This clinical trial was double-blind since the evaluators who were not included in the restorative procedures and the participants were blinded to tested groups, but the operator wasn't blinded to these groups

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 40 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • better dental hygiene
  • discolored vital anterior teeth

排除标准

  • Para functional activities
  • Non-vital teeth

结局指标

主要结局

Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline, six, nine, twelve, and eighteen months by two calibrated examiners using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria

时间窗: eighteen months

The perfect clinical scenario was represented by a score of 0, clinically acceptable by a score of 1, dubious by a score of 2, and clinically unsatisfactory by a score of 3 and 4.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mohammed Abd El Ghany Mohammed

Assistant lecturer

Tanta University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验