Evaluation of Template Assisted Monochromatic Structural Colored Versus Universal Multi-Shade Direct Composite Veneers
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 20
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline, six, nine, twelve, and eighteen months by two calibrated examiners using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of this study was to conduct a clinical trial utilizing a modified split-mouth, double-blinded, randomized strategy to clinically assess template assisted one shade structural colored versus universal multi-shade direct composite veneers
详细描述
The superior mechanical qualities, superb aesthetics, and versatility of resin-based composites (RBCs) make them popular choices for direct restorative applications. Compared to their predecessors, nanocomposites have shown superior qualities since nanotechnology was introduced in the production of dental RBCs.
A restoration's aesthetic integration is mostly the result of its chromatic characteristics. Pigments included in the composition of the restorative material typically control the selective reflection of wavelengths to emulate the natural tooth. In order to better reflect the broad color range that characterizes real dentition, RBCs have more recently employed the phenomena of "structural color" .
Thanks to the novel property of resins, color differences between the tooth and the restoration are eliminated or balanced out as perceived color of a region moves toward the color of the surrounding area . Additionally, as opposed to multi-shade RBCs, single-shade RBCs eliminate the need to select between various resin shades, streamlining the color choosing procedure and cutting down on time lost during the clinical resin selection process. The Vita Classic Shade Guide's shades can all be matched with these materials.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
This clinical trial was double-blind since the evaluators who were not included in the restorative procedures and the participants were blinded to tested groups, but the operator wasn't blinded to these groups
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 40 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •better dental hygiene
- •discolored vital anterior teeth
排除标准
- •Para functional activities
- •Non-vital teeth
结局指标
主要结局
Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline, six, nine, twelve, and eighteen months by two calibrated examiners using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria
时间窗: eighteen months
The perfect clinical scenario was represented by a score of 0, clinically acceptable by a score of 1, dubious by a score of 2, and clinically unsatisfactory by a score of 3 and 4.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Mohammed Abd El Ghany Mohammed
Assistant lecturer
Tanta University
