Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06543654
NCT06543654CompletedNot Applicable

Evaluation of Template Assisted Monochromatic Structural Colored Versus Universal Multi-Shade Direct Composite Veneers

Tanta University1 site in 1 country20 target enrollmentStarted: July 19, 2022Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
20
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline, six, nine, twelve, and eighteen months by two calibrated examiners using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to conduct a clinical trial utilizing a modified split-mouth, double-blinded, randomized strategy to clinically assess template assisted one shade structural colored versus universal multi-shade direct composite veneers

Detailed Description

The superior mechanical qualities, superb aesthetics, and versatility of resin-based composites (RBCs) make them popular choices for direct restorative applications. Compared to their predecessors, nanocomposites have shown superior qualities since nanotechnology was introduced in the production of dental RBCs.

A restoration's aesthetic integration is mostly the result of its chromatic characteristics. Pigments included in the composition of the restorative material typically control the selective reflection of wavelengths to emulate the natural tooth. In order to better reflect the broad color range that characterizes real dentition, RBCs have more recently employed the phenomena of "structural color" .

Thanks to the novel property of resins, color differences between the tooth and the restoration are eliminated or balanced out as perceived color of a region moves toward the color of the surrounding area . Additionally, as opposed to multi-shade RBCs, single-shade RBCs eliminate the need to select between various resin shades, streamlining the color choosing procedure and cutting down on time lost during the clinical resin selection process. The Vita Classic Shade Guide's shades can all be matched with these materials.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

This clinical trial was double-blind since the evaluators who were not included in the restorative procedures and the participants were blinded to tested groups, but the operator wasn't blinded to these groups

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 40 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •better dental hygiene
  • •discolored vital anterior teeth

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Para functional activities
  • •Non-vital teeth

Arms & Interventions

Omnichroma

Experimental

Monochromatic structural colored composite

Intervention: Ceram. X Spectra (Other)

Omnichroma

Experimental

Monochromatic structural colored composite

Intervention: Omnichroma (Other)

Ceram. X Spectra

Experimental

Universal multi shade composite

Intervention: Omnichroma (Other)

Ceram. X Spectra

Experimental

Universal multi shade composite

Intervention: Ceram. X Spectra (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline, six, nine, twelve, and eighteen months by two calibrated examiners using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria

Time Frame: eighteen months

The perfect clinical scenario was represented by a score of 0, clinically acceptable by a score of 1, dubious by a score of 2, and clinically unsatisfactory by a score of 3 and 4.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Mohammed Abd El Ghany Mohammed

Assistant lecturer

Tanta University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials