跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06873828
NCT06873828尚未招募3 期

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Wearable ECG (AT-Patch) in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Requiring 48-Hour Holter Monitoring : A Prospective Superiority Study

Yonsei University0 个研究点目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2025年3月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
100
主要终点
Comparison of arrhythmia detection rates between the test group and the control group after using a medical device for clinical trials

研究概览

简要总结

  • Validation of validity, superiority, and safety of data analysis results using AT-Patch compared to 48-hour Holter test results
  • Number of subjects: 100 (including 10% dropout rate)
  • Performance and safety were verified by simultaneously attaching a 48-hour Holter and a wearable Holter device (ATP-C75 or ATP-C135).

详细描述

Prospective, sequential, superiority test Patients diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who require 48-hour Holter monitoring.

  • 48-hour Holter vs ATP-C75 (48-hour comparison/total time comparison)
  • 48-hour Holter vs ATP-C135 (48-hour comparison/total time comparison)
  • Comparison between IDs

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
19 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Male and female subjects aged 19 years or older
  • •Subjects diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who require 48-hour Holter examination

排除标准

  • •Those judged by the investigator to be unsuitable for this clinical trial or those who may increase the risk due to participation in the clinical trial
  • •Those with sensitive or allergic skin, skin diseases such as skin cancer or rashes
  • •Those with pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, or other implantable electrical devices
  • •Pregnant women

结局指标

主要结局

Comparison of arrhythmia detection rates between the test group and the control group after using a medical device for clinical trials

时间窗: ATP-C75 : 7day , ATP-C135 : 14day

* 48-hour Holter vs ATP-C75 (48-hour comparison/7days) * 48-hour Holter vs ATP-C135 (48-hour comparison/14days)

次要结局

  • Arrhythmia detection rate by test time in the test group and control group after using the clinical trial medical device(■48-hour Holter vs ATP-C75 (48-hour comparison/7days) ■48-hour Holter vs ATP-C135 (48-hour comparison/ 14days))
  • User response evaluation (satisfaction) in the test group and control group after using the clinical trial medical device(■48-hour Holter : 48hrs ■ATP-C75 : 7days ■ATP-C135 : 14days)
  • Comparison of the concordance rate of the analysis results of the simultaneous attachment time in the test group and control group after using the clinical trial medical device(■48-hour Holter vs ATP-C75 (48-hour comparison) ■48-hour Holter vs ATP-C135 (48-hour comparison))
  • Arrhythmia detection rate in the test group and control group by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy subtype (Apical HCM, Non-apical HCM)(■48-hour Holter vs ATP-C75 (48-hour comparison/7days) ■48-hour Holter vs ATP-C135 (48-hour comparison/ 14days))
  • Arrhythmia detection rate by test group (ATP-C75, ATP-C135)(■ATP-C75 vs ATP-C135 ( 7days vs 14days ))

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验