Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03925987
NCT03925987CompletedNot Applicable

Predicting Treatment Response to Exposure Therapy Using a CO2 Habituation Paradigm in Patients With High Levels of Anxiety Sensitivity

Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Inc.2 sites in 1 country70 target enrollmentStarted: June 7, 2018Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
70
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Between-session habituation of self-reported anxiety

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Anxiety disorders affect over a quarter of the population, yet very little is known about the variables that predict treatment outcome. The planned study explores whether a patient's response to a physiological test involving inhalation of carbon dioxide predicts their response to exposure therapy.

Detailed Description

Anxiety Sensitivity (AS) refers to an individual's fear of experiencing anxiety-related symptoms (e.g., dyspnea or heart palpitations) and is a core construct underlying the initiation and maintenance of pathological anxiety. Recent evidence suggests that reducing AS may be critical for the prevention and treatment of anxiety across diagnostic categories. Exposure therapy, an important component of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), is one of the most effective treatments for reducing AS, and has been shown to improve symptoms across a number of different anxiety disorders. Meta-analyses reveal an approximately 50% treatment response rate, with the remaining half of patients showing either no response or dropping out of treatment early. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of research exploring which variables predict treatment outcome and there are currently no tests for predicting which patients would benefit the most from exposure therapy. In this study, participants will complete two sessions of a carbon dioxide (CO2) habituation paradigm, a safe and noninvasive physiological test that entails repeated exposures to single vital capacity inhalations of 20% CO2. Both CO2 testing sessions will be completed within a 72-hour time period. Patients then complete a 10-week group-based exposure therapy to determine whether an individual's degree of habituation to CO2 predicts treatment outcome.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 55 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • DSM-V diagnosis of an Anxiety disorder (Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Social Anxiety Disorder, Panic Disorder, Agoraphobia)
  • Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI-3) total score > 29
  • Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) score > 8
  • Between 18-55 years of age
  • Subject must be "treatment-seeking" and willing to enroll in the 10-week group-based Exposure Therapy

Exclusion Criteria

  • Comorbid Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, Anorexia or Bulimia Nervosa, or Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
  • Current Substance Use Disorder > moderate (within the past 6 months)
  • Currently taking a psychotropic medication
  • Currently receiving psychotherapy/counseling for anxiety
  • Currently being treated as an inpatient
  • Active suicidal ideation with intent or plan
  • History of neurological, cardiovascular or respiratory problems (e.g., asthma, severe brain injury)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Between-session habituation of self-reported anxiety

Time Frame: Across two days of CO2 testing within a 72-hour window

Maximum anxiety rating on a 10-point rating dial (0=no anxiety to 10=most anxiety ever) during day 1 of CO2 testing minus the maximum anxiety rating during day 2 of CO2 testing

Secondary Outcomes

  • Between-session habituation of self-reported dyspnea(Across two days of CO2 testing within a 72-hour window)
  • Between-session reduction in avoidance behavior(Across two days of CO2 testing within a 72-hour window)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Predicting Treatment Response to Exposure... | Clinical Trial