MedPath

Comparison of the Visual Performance After Implantation of Multifocal Lens

Conditions
Intraocular Lens
Interventions
Procedure: trifocal lens
Procedure: bifocal lens 2
Procedure: bifocal lens 1
Procedure: bifocal lens 3
Registration Number
NCT03586271
Lead Sponsor
Aier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University
Brief Summary

This is a prospective, consecutive, nonrandomized,comparative study. Comparison of the Visual Performance After Implantation of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens and Two Bifocal Intraocular Lenses

Detailed Description

Multifocal intraocular lenses were introduced in the 1980s and have the benefit of promoting near and far vision simultaneous. However, these multifocal lenses have the disadvantages, including lower contrast sensitivity(CS) and visual discomfort, such as halos, glares and starburst, et al. Therefore, careful patient selection is crucial to achieve good postoperative results. The purpose of this study was to compare the visual outcomes and subjective visual quality between bifocal intraocular Lens(ReSTOR +2.5/+ 3.0D and Diff-aay) and trifocal intraocular Lens(AT Lisa tri 839MP). This prospective, nonrandomized, consecutive, comparative study included the assessment of 60 patients implanted with multifocal intraocular lens. visual acuity was tested in all cases. Ophthalmological evaluation included the measurement of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), the analysis of contrast sensitivity (CS), visual defocus curve, spectacle independence, patient satisfaction, residual sphere, spherical equivalent (SE), cylinder and complications.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • cataract
Exclusion Criteria
  • existence of any corneal disease;
  • previous eye surgery;
  • illiteracy;
  • previous refractive surgery;
  • expected postoperative corneal astigmatism more than 1.00D;
  • higer-order aberration more than 0.3;
  • spherical aberration more than 0.3μm;
  • intraoperative or postoperative complications.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
bifocal lens 1trifocal lensbifocal lens implantation(Diff-aay)
bifocal lens 1bifocal lens 2bifocal lens implantation(Diff-aay)
bifocal lens 1bifocal lens 3bifocal lens implantation(Diff-aay)
bifocal lens 2trifocal lensbifocal lens implantation(ReSTOR +3.0D)
bifocal lens 2bifocal lens 1bifocal lens implantation(ReSTOR +3.0D)
bifocal lens 3bifocal lens 2bifocal lens implantation(ReSTOR +2.5D)
trifocal lensbifocal lens 1trifocal lens implantation(AT Lisa tri 839MP)
trifocal lensbifocal lens 2trifocal lens implantation(AT Lisa tri 839MP)
trifocal lensbifocal lens 3trifocal lens implantation(AT Lisa tri 839MP)
bifocal lens 2bifocal lens 3bifocal lens implantation(ReSTOR +3.0D)
bifocal lens 3trifocal lensbifocal lens implantation(ReSTOR +2.5D)
bifocal lens 3bifocal lens 1bifocal lens implantation(ReSTOR +2.5D)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Uncorrected intermediate visual acuity3 months after surgery

Uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (60cm) were measured using the reading table model of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts (ETDRS; Vector Vision, Ltd, Greenville, OH, USA).

Uncorrected distance visual acuity3 months after surgery

Uncorrected distance visual acuity (4m) were measured using the reading table model of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts (ETDRS; Vector Vision, Ltd, Greenville, OH, USA).

Uncorrected near visual acuity3 months after surgery

Uncorrected near visual acuity (40cm) were measured using the reading table model of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts (ETDRS; Vector Vision, Ltd, Greenville, OH, USA).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Wensheng Li

🇨🇳

Shanghai, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath