Comparison of the Visual Performance After Implantation of Multifocal Lens
- Conditions
- Intraocular Lens
- Interventions
- Procedure: trifocal lensProcedure: bifocal lens 2Procedure: bifocal lens 1Procedure: bifocal lens 3
- Registration Number
- NCT03586271
- Lead Sponsor
- Aier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University
- Brief Summary
This is a prospective, consecutive, nonrandomized,comparative study. Comparison of the Visual Performance After Implantation of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens and Two Bifocal Intraocular Lenses
- Detailed Description
Multifocal intraocular lenses were introduced in the 1980s and have the benefit of promoting near and far vision simultaneous. However, these multifocal lenses have the disadvantages, including lower contrast sensitivity(CS) and visual discomfort, such as halos, glares and starburst, et al. Therefore, careful patient selection is crucial to achieve good postoperative results. The purpose of this study was to compare the visual outcomes and subjective visual quality between bifocal intraocular Lens(ReSTOR +2.5/+ 3.0D and Diff-aay) and trifocal intraocular Lens(AT Lisa tri 839MP). This prospective, nonrandomized, consecutive, comparative study included the assessment of 60 patients implanted with multifocal intraocular lens. visual acuity was tested in all cases. Ophthalmological evaluation included the measurement of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), the analysis of contrast sensitivity (CS), visual defocus curve, spectacle independence, patient satisfaction, residual sphere, spherical equivalent (SE), cylinder and complications.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- cataract
- existence of any corneal disease;
- previous eye surgery;
- illiteracy;
- previous refractive surgery;
- expected postoperative corneal astigmatism more than 1.00D;
- higer-order aberration more than 0.3;
- spherical aberration more than 0.3μm;
- intraoperative or postoperative complications.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description bifocal lens 1 trifocal lens bifocal lens implantation(Diff-aay) bifocal lens 1 bifocal lens 2 bifocal lens implantation(Diff-aay) bifocal lens 1 bifocal lens 3 bifocal lens implantation(Diff-aay) bifocal lens 2 trifocal lens bifocal lens implantation(ReSTOR +3.0D) bifocal lens 2 bifocal lens 1 bifocal lens implantation(ReSTOR +3.0D) bifocal lens 3 bifocal lens 2 bifocal lens implantation(ReSTOR +2.5D) trifocal lens bifocal lens 1 trifocal lens implantation(AT Lisa tri 839MP) trifocal lens bifocal lens 2 trifocal lens implantation(AT Lisa tri 839MP) trifocal lens bifocal lens 3 trifocal lens implantation(AT Lisa tri 839MP) bifocal lens 2 bifocal lens 3 bifocal lens implantation(ReSTOR +3.0D) bifocal lens 3 trifocal lens bifocal lens implantation(ReSTOR +2.5D) bifocal lens 3 bifocal lens 1 bifocal lens implantation(ReSTOR +2.5D)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Uncorrected intermediate visual acuity 3 months after surgery Uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (60cm) were measured using the reading table model of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts (ETDRS; Vector Vision, Ltd, Greenville, OH, USA).
Uncorrected distance visual acuity 3 months after surgery Uncorrected distance visual acuity (4m) were measured using the reading table model of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts (ETDRS; Vector Vision, Ltd, Greenville, OH, USA).
Uncorrected near visual acuity 3 months after surgery Uncorrected near visual acuity (40cm) were measured using the reading table model of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts (ETDRS; Vector Vision, Ltd, Greenville, OH, USA).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Wensheng Li
🇨🇳Shanghai, China