跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04002726
NCT04002726终止不适用

Developing and Evaluating Trachoma Diagnosis Training Tools in Preparation for the Trachoma Elimination Endgame: Investigating the Effectiveness, Acceptability and Feasibility of an App-based Versus Slide-based IGA Test for Trachoma Graders

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 32 人开始时间: 2019年7月8日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
32
试验地点
1
主要终点
Classroom IGA success

研究概览

简要总结

Trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF) is diagnosed by looking for clinical signs of infection of everted eyelids (conjunctivae) of children.

The overall objective of this project is to investigate the effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility of an app-based versus slide-based IGA for trachoma graders.

Fieldwork will take place during routine Tropical Data trainings. A non-inferiority randomised controlled trial design will be employed, with grader trainees randomised to app- or slide-based training, and then to app- or slide-based IGA testing. The training and IGA testing method will be compared with field IGA test score to determine which method best predicts passing the field IGA test.

详细描述

Trachoma graders are currently trained using either slide- or app-based testing systems. The investigators want to formally assess whether the app-based training and testing system leads to better field-based diagnosis than the slide-based training and testing system. The investigators will also ask participants for their views on acceptability of the two systems and conduct a cost-consequences analysis of the two systems.

Objectives and approach:

1.1 To compare the two classroom IGA tests (app-based and slides-based) in terms of their ability to predict trainee success in the field IGA test.

1.2 To assess whether the kappa score threshold for the classroom IGA tests is appropriate.

1.3 To conduct a cost-consequences analysis of the training systems in order to effectively target the use of an app-based assessment and training system.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Other
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •All trainers and trainee graders who attend selected Tropical Data training events will be eligible for inclusion in the study.

排除标准

  • •Individuals who do not provide consent are not eligible for inclusion in the study.

研究组 & 干预措施

Group Aa

Active Comparator

Allocated to do the app-based training. Allocated to do the app-based classroom IGA test first, and the slide-based test second.

干预措施: Inter-grader agreement (IGA) app (Other)

Group As

Active Comparator

Allocated to do the app-based training. Allocated to do the slide-based classroom IGA test first, and the app-based test second.

干预措施: Inter-grader agreement (IGA) app (Other)

Group Sa

Active Comparator

Allocated to do the slide-based training. Allocated to do the app-based classroom IGA test first, and the slide-based test second.

干预措施: Inter-grader agreement (IGA) app (Other)

Group Ss

Active Comparator

Allocated to do the app-based training. Allocated to do the slide-based classroom IGA test first, and the app-based test second.

干预措施: Inter-grader agreement (IGA) app (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Classroom IGA success

时间窗: 1 day

The proportion of participants successfully passing (kappa ≥0.7) the app-based IGA.

Field IGA success

时间窗: 3 days

The correlation between classroom IGA score and field IGA score

次要结局

  • Trainee characteristics(5 days)
  • Acceptability and feasibility (common themes from focus group discussions) of app versus slide-based training.(45 minutes)
  • Acceptability and feasibility (common themes from focus group discussions) of app versus slide-based IGA testing.(45 minutes)
  • Cost of app versus slide-based training(5 days)
  • Cost of app versus slide-based IGA testing(5 days)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验