Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03326622
NCT03326622
Completed
Not Applicable

The Role of Moderate Aerobic Exercise as Determined by Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in ALS

University of Lisbon0 sites48 target enrollmentJuly 1, 2013

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Sponsor
University of Lisbon
Enrollment
48
Primary Endpoint
Functional decline between start and end of the study
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This study evaluated the influence of a tailored aerobic exercise protocol on the functional outcome in ALS patients. In addition, the investigators compare some CPET variables collected during exercise testing in both groups.

Detailed Description

This work aimed to evaluate the effects of a moderate aerobic exercise with controlled intensity determined by Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) and its role on the functional status in ALS patients versus standard care. Additionally, the investigators explored the performance of CPET variables - oxygen uptake (VO2) expressed in L/min, in percentage of predicted or in metabolic equivalents (METs) at peak effort, at anaerobic threshold (AT), the respiratory compensation point (RCP) when achieved, Dioxide Carbon output in L/min (VCO2) and the minute ventilation in L/min (VE) throughout the study. Assessments:(diagnostic visit - T0), at study entry (T1) and 6 months after (T2) using: Functional status by Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), Respiratory function tests (RFT): Forced Vital Capacity predicted (%FVC) and Oxygen saturation provided by pulse oximetry. CPET was performed in both groups at study entry and 6 months later (T1 and T2), using a treadmill (WOODWAY®) coupled with a gas exchange analyzer (METALYZER® 3B) with ergo-spirometry system using a breath-by-breath technology developed by CORTEX® systems. Intervention: G1(Interventional group) performed moderate exercise protocol two times/week in a treadmill in the lower range of the training zone determined by CPET + standard care (range of motion exercise, gait and balance training under continuous pulse oximetry observation). G2 (control group) performed a standard care exercise program at home or at other rehabilitation units without pulse oximetry observation.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 1, 2013
End Date
June 30, 2015
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Anna Caroline Braga

Investigator

University of Lisbon

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Consecutive patients diagnosed with definite, probable, or probable laboratory supported ALS
  • Disease duration from first symptoms between 6-24 months to exclude slow and fast progression
  • ALSFRS-R ≥ 30
  • FVC (%predicted) ≥ 70%

Exclusion Criteria

  • Other medical conditions, like cardiac insufficiency and lung disorders or others conditions limiting exercise training;
  • Heavy smoking habits with laboratorial evidence of significant bronchial constriction;
  • Signs of associated dementia or psychiatric disorders.
  • Note: None of the patients were on tube feeding, invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation at admission of study protocol (T1).

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Functional decline between start and end of the study

Time Frame: between baseline and 6 months later

It was used the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R),which rates the functionality of the ALS patients in performing activities involving 4 different areas through 3 sub-scores - bulbar, spinal \[upper and lower limb\] and also the respiratory function. Each of its questions is rated from 0 (total inability) to 4 points (no functional limitation). The last three questions address the respiratory function (dyspnea, orthopnea, respiratory insufficiency) and assess the respiratory functional outcome. The sub-scores rating: Bulbar sub-score between 0 - 12, the spinal score between 0 - 24 and the respiratory sub-score between 0 - 12.The sum of the sub-scores provide an ALSFRS-R total score = 48. Higher values represent a better functionality.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Performance of Cardiopulmonary Exercise testing variables throughout the study(at study entry and 6 months later.)
  • Changes on the Dioxide Carbon output (VCO2) measurement(at study entry and 6 months later)
  • Changes on the Minute Ventilation (VE) measurement(at study entry and 6 months later)

Similar Trials