MedPath

"Pseudo-scanner" MRI Sequences for the Detection of Bone Lesions in Multiple Myeloma

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Multiple Myeloma Bone Disease
Registration Number
NCT06988020
Lead Sponsor
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain
Brief Summary

Recent work has confirmed the diagnostic performance of pseudo-CT sequences for detecting osteolytic lesions. Their integration into whole body MRI (WB MRI) could transform the diagnostic approach to MM, by allowing a combined assessment of bone marrow involvement, tissue viability and osteolysis, during a single non-irradiating imaging examination. Since the preliminary work mentioned above, optimizations have been made to the pseudo-CT sequences, including the addition of deep learning (correcting noise in the images) and the correction of chemical shift artifact (linked to the coexistence of hydrated tissue and fatty tissue), which carry real hope of improving their diagnostic potential and accuracy.

Detailed Description

Currently recommended imaging techniques for detecting bone lesions include whole-body MRI (WB-MRI), computed tomography (CT), and PET-CT. WB-MRI and PET-CT outperform CT for assessing treatment response, with WB-MRI already being the imaging modality of choice in many countries. However WB-MRI, the technique of choice for detecting bone marrow involvement, does not allow visualization of mineral bone, limiting its ability to accurately assess osteolysis. Zero Echo Time (ZTE) and Lava Flex Low Flip Angle (LF) MRI sequences represent a major advance, providing visualization of tissues at very short T2 relaxation times with resolution close to that of CT. These new sequences (known as pseudo-CT or pseudo-CT) offer for the first time the opportunity to study mineral bone by MRI, thus considerably increasing the diagnostic potential of this modality in MM.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
45
Inclusion Criteria

Patient with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, for whom bone imaging is required for staging.

  • Recurrent patient after intensive treatment (high dose chemotherapy, bone marrow transplant, etc.).
  • Patient requiring a PET / CT considered as the technique of choice in these stages of the disease.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Implanted material incompatible with MRI.
  • Severe claustrophobia.
  • Pregnant women

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the different imaging protocolsthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The diagnostic performance of the different imaging protocols will be evaluated by analyzing the receptor efficiency function (ROC curve) and by estimating the Sensitivity (Se), Specificity (Sp), Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV) ) as well as the Predictive Accuracy (Acc) of the different imaging protocols.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of Sensitivity (Se) and Predictive Precision (Acc) of the different imaging protocolsthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

McNemar test on paired data. The Gold Standard will be determined by a panel of independent experts based on all available imaging techniques.

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc

🇧🇪

Brussels, Belgium

Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc

🇧🇪

Brussels, Belgium

Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc
🇧🇪Brussels, Belgium
Frederic Emmanuel Lecouvet, Md PhD
Contact
+3227652793
frederic.lecouvet@saintluc.uclouvain.be
Perrine Triqueneaux, Msc
Contact
027642935
perrine.triqueneaux@saintluc.uclouvain.be
Frédéric Lecouvet, MD PhD
Principal Investigator

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.