Effect of Peer support, Remote, on subjective well-being in patients with colorectal cancer

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Colorectal cancer.; C18 Malignant neoplasm of colon. C19 Malignant neoplasm of rectosigmoid junction. C20 Malignant neoplasm of rectum; C18-20

• Registration Number: IRCT20190123042480N1
• Lead Sponsor: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Last Update Posted: 23 April 2019

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Complete
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 60

Inclusion Criteria

People over the age of 18, who have colorectal cancer based on cytological diagnostic findings and an oncologist's confirmation.
does not have severe cognitive impairment (his Psychological examination score is greater than 22 of 30).
Have literacy reading and writing.
Have audiovisual health (ability to hear and see even with auxiliary equipment).
Give the phone number to calling.
Have the ability to use smartphone and internet (virtual network).
Have the ability to communicate verbally and non verbally.
The peer also must, in addition to the research unit criteria, have a score of at least 40, from the Warwick-Edinburgh Subjective Welfare Questionnaire, and successfully completed the treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with colorectal cancer, which have fistulas.

Study & Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Subjective well-being Score, in the Warwick Edinburgh Questionnaire. Timepoint: Before the intervention and one month after the end of the intervention. Method of measurement: Warwick Edinburgh subjective well-being Questionnaire.