Propofol vs etomidate on haemodynamic parameters during ProsSeal laryngeal mask insertio

Not Applicable

Conditions: Hemodynamic response during airway insertion

Registration Number: SLCTR/2017/038

Lead Sponsor: Vinayaka Missions Medical College

Brief Summary: Not available

Detailed Description: Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: Pending

Sex: Not specified

Target Recruitment: Not specified

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male and female adults (>18 years)
2. American society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classes I and II,
3. Normal airway
4. Undergoing elective surgeries of short duration (1 hour or less)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Full stomach
2. Emergency surgery
3. Significant cardiorespiratory illness
4. Bowel surgeries
5. Laparoscopic surgeries
6. Difficult airway
7. Known allergy to study drugs

Study & Design

Study Type: Interventional

Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in the following haemodynamic parameters<br>1.1. Pulse rate per minute<br>1.2. Blood pressure as measured as measured by non invasive automated monitor. (BPL EXCELO)<br> [Immediately before and after LMA insertion]<br>

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Upper airway trauma by visual inspection of the device and the oropharynx [During LMA insertion and LMA removal<br>]<br>Desaturation (SpO2 <90%), as determined by a AS/3 Compact Anesthesia Monitor [During LMA insertion.]<br>Patient movement on a 2 point scale (present/absent)<br> [During LMA insertion.]<br>Ease of insertion on a 5 point Likert scale (1=very easy and 5=very difficult) [During LMA insertion.]<br>Gagging: On clinical observation [During LMA insertion.]<br>Laryngospasm: On clinical observation [During LMA insertion.]<br>Post-operative sore throat: on a 10 point visual analogue scale / verbal rating numerical pain score (0=no pain and 10 worst pain imaginable) [ During LMA removal.]<br>