MedPath

Diagnosis of Bile Duct Strictures

Completed
Conditions
Pancreatic Cancer
Chronic Pancreatitis
Bile Duct Stricture
Cholangiocarcinoma
Interventions
Other: brushing of bile duct strictures for cytology
Registration Number
NCT02000999
Lead Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Brief Summary

The purpose of this prospective study is to compare the diagnostic utility of two techniques (brush cytology + FISH and brush cytology + free DNA analysis) in the diagnosis of biliary strictures. Histologic diagnosis (biopsies) in conjunction with clinical and/or imaging follow-up will serve as the gold standard for diagnosis of malignancy. In order to do this the investigators will ask study participants to have a small volume of fluid obtained from the bile duct sent for additional testing at RedPATH. In some patients additional brushings will be obtained for FISH testing (this adds \<2 minutes to ERCP and only associated risk is increased procedure duration).

The investigators hypothesize that the use of cytology +DNA analysis has a higher sensitivity and accuracy when compared to cytology +FISH in patients with biliary strictures.

Primary aim:

To compare the sensitivity and accuracy of the two techniques (brush cytology + FISH and brush cytology + free DNA analysis). Histologic diagnosis (histology from biopsy or cytology for fine needle aspiration) in conjunction with clinical and/or imaging follow-up will serve as the gold standard for diagnosis of malignancy.

Secondary aims:

1. To evaluate the diagnostic yield of malignancy when all three techniques (cytology, FISH and DNA analysis) are used.

2. To evaluate the added value of biliary forceps biopsies, when used in conjunction with cytology, FISH and DNA analysis.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
110
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Patients age: > 18 years
  2. Presence of a biliary stricture
  3. Ability to provide written informed consent.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Severe coagulopathy (INR > 1.8) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50,000)
  2. Inability to cannulate the common bile duct
  3. Presence of altered anatomy (Billroth II or Roux-en-Y reconstruction)
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Patients with bile duct stricturesbrushing of bile duct strictures for cytology-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
• Sensitivity accuracy of cytology, FISH and mutation profiling using histologic diagnosis in conjunction with clinical and/or imaging follow-up as the gold standard.2 years
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
• Technical success and ease of procedure2 years
• Specimen adequacy2 years
• Complications (pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, cholangitis)2 years

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Washington University

🇺🇸

Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath