MedPath

Surgery Alone Versus Neoadjuvant Treatment Followed by Surgery For MRI-defined T3 Mid-low Rectal Cancer

Completed
Conditions
Rectal Cancer
Registration Number
NCT05496270
Lead Sponsor
Sun Yat-sen University
Brief Summary

Neoadjuvant treatments (nCRT) are becoming the standard treatment for patients with stage II or stage III mid-low rectal cancer. In fact, with the introduction of total mesorectal excision, the local recurrence has been reduced significantly. Recently few studies have shown that surgery alone is enough for patients with T3 rectal cancer. These issues raised the question of whether nCRT is needed for all T3 rectal cancer patients. Therefore, this study was designed to compare the long-term oncological outcomes between surgery and surgery following nCRT among patients with MRI-defined T3, clear MRF mid-low rectal cancer.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1509
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Eighteen- to eighty-year-old patients.
  2. T3 rectal cancer with clear mesorectal fascia (MRF),
  3. within 12 cm from the anal verge at initial diagnosis by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Exclusion Criteria
  1. emergency surgery due to bleeding, perforation, and bowel obstruction,
  2. recurrent rectal cancer,
  3. inflammatory bowel disease,
  4. Stage IV.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
3-year diseases free survival3 years after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Local recurrence rate3 years after the surgery
3-year overall survival rate3 years after surgery
Number of participants with surgical complications30 days after surgery
Margin-free (R0)resection rateImmediately after the surgery

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.