MedPath

earlY Upper Limb Rehabilitation WIth EEG-Neurofeedback After Stroke

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Stroke Rehabilitation
Stroke, Ischemic
Brain Infarction
Stroke Hemorrhagic
Stroke
Interventions
Other: SHAM electroencephalographic neurofeedback
Other: electroencephalographic neurofeedback
Registration Number
NCT05884762
Lead Sponsor
Rennes University Hospital
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of early rehabilitation treatment by electroencephalographic neurofeedback on upper limb motor function after stroke.

Researchers will compare :

Interventional group: electroencephalographic neurofeedback + traditional reference rehabilitation programme Control group: SHAM electroencephalographic neurofeedback + traditional reference rehabilitation programme

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • Unilateral ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke
  • Adult (18-80 years), both sexes
  • Stroke < 3 weeks
  • Upper limb deficit defined by Shoulder Abduction Finger Extension score <5 on day 3 of stroke; i.e., patients predicted to have incomplete recovery
  • No participation-limiting comprehension problems
  • With or without homonymous lateral hemianopia; with or without visuospatial hemineglect
  • Free, informed and written consent signed by the patient or a member of the patient's family (in the case of a patient who is able to understand the information and give consent but has motor difficulties resulting in an invalid signature).
  • Affiliated to french social security
Exclusion Criteria
  • Ischemic or hemorrhagic brain stem and/or cerebellum involvement

  • Multiple strokes

  • Stroke < 1 week; in order not to be deleterious by starting active rehabilitation too early after immediate stroke

  • Aphasia with major comprehension impairment

  • Contraindication to MRI

    • pacemaker or implantable defibrillator,
    • neurosurgical clips,
    • cochlear implants,
    • intra-orbital or encephalic metallic foreign bodies,
    • stents placed less than 4 weeks ago and osteosynthesis devices placed less than 6 weeks ago,
    • claustrophobia.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Control groupSHAM electroencephalographic neurofeedbackSHAM electroencephalographic neurofeedback + traditional reference rehabilitation programme
Interventional groupelectroencephalographic neurofeedbackelectroencephalographic neurofeedback + traditional reference rehabilitation programme
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Measurement of motor impairment by the Fugl-Meyer Assesment - Upper Extremity28 days

Measurement of motor impairment by the Fugl-Meyer Assesment - Upper Extremity

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Progression in The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)3 months

Progression in The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)

Brain datas (fMRI activity and CST tractography)28 days

Brain datas (fMRI activity and CST tractography)

Changes in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) score3 months

Changes in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) score

Progression in The Composite Functional Independence Scale (MIF)3 months

Progression in The Composite Functional Independence Scale (MIF)

Progression in Evaluation of the Motor activiy Log (MAL)3 months

Progression in Evaluation of the Motor activiy Log (MAL)

Brain activity measured by electroencephalogram : improvement in cerebral activations in target zones28 days

Brain activity measured by electroencephalogram : improvement in cerebral activations in target zones

Changes in force emitted (in kg) during a palmar grip (JAMAR)3 months

Changes force emitted (in kg) during a palmar grip (JAMAR)

Changes in ACTIVE RANGE OF MOTION (CxA) composite score3 months

Changes in ACTIVE RANGE OF MOTION (CxA) composite score

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Rennes Chu

🇫🇷

Rennes, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath