EUCTR2016-000298-20-AT进行中（未招募）1 期
Comparison of epidural Chloroprocaine 3% and Ropivacaine 0.75% for unplanned Caesarean section in labouring women who have an epidural catheter in situ - Chloroprocaine 3% - Epidural
适应症
相关药物
试验速览
- 阶段
- 1 期
- 状态
- 进行中（未招募）
- 入组人数
- 96
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product
入排标准
- 性别
- Female
入选标准
- •1. Informed consent: Signed written informed consent before inclusion in the study (obtained from women fulfilling the criteria, only when effective analgesia has been established)
- •2. Sex, pregnancy status and age: Labouring women with singleton pregnancy, = 18 years old
- •3. Epidural catheter: Previously sited epidural catheter
- •4. ASA physical status: I-II
- •5. Analgesia: Effective analgesia established following combined spinal
- •epidural analgesia (CSE)
- •6. Term gestation: = 36 weeks
- •7. Caesarean section: Unplanned Caesarean section category 2 or 3,
- •according to Lucas Classification
- •8. Body Mass Index (BMI): = 40 kg/m2
- •9. Full comprehension: ability to comprehend the full nature and purpose
- •of the study, including possible risks and side effects; ability to co-operate
- •with the investigator and to comply with the requirements of the entire study.
- •Are the trial subjects under 18? no
- •Number of subjects for this age range:
- •F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes
- •F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 96
- •F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no
- •F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range
排除标准
- •1. Physical findings: Clinically significant abnormal physical findings which could interfere with the objectives of the study. Contraindications
- •to epidural anaesthesia
- •2. ASA physical status: III-V
- •3. Further anaesthesia: Patients expected to require further anaesthesia
- •4. Epidural catheter: Epidural catheter failure (epidural catheter replacement required or inability to provide effective analgesia)
- •5. Pregnancy: Labouring women with multiple pregnancy
- •6. Caesarean section: Elective Caesarean section
- •7. Allergy: ascertained or presumptive hypersensitivity to the active principle and /or formulations ingredients; ascertained or presumptive
- •hypersensitivity to the amide and ester-type anaesthetics
- •8. Diseases: significant history of renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal,
- •cardiovascular, respiratory, skin, haematological, endocrine or
- •neurological diseases that may interfere with the aim of the study;
- •ascertained psychiatric diseases, eclampsia, antepartum haemorrhage,
- •sepsis, blood coagulation disorders, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus,
- •terminal kidney failure
- •9. Medications: Medication known to interfere with the extent of regional
- •blocks (see chloroprocaine and ropivacaine SmPCs) for 2 weeks before
- •the start of the study
- •10. Investigative drug studies: participation in the evaluation of any investigational product for 3 months before this study, calculated from
- •the first day of the month following the last visit of the previous study
- •11. Drug, alcohol: history of drug or alcohol abuse
- •12. Plasma cholinesterase: Known plasma cholinesterase deficiency.
研究者
相似试验
进行中（未招募）
1 期
Comparison of epidural Chloroprocaine 3% and Ropivacaine 0.75% for unplanned Caesarean section in labouring women who have an epidural catheter in situEUCTR2016-000298-20-BESintetica S.A.96
进行中（未招募）
1 期
Comparison of epidural Chloroprocaine 3% and Ropivacaine 0.75% forunplanned Caesarean section in labouring women who have an epiduralcatheter in situocal epidural anaesthesia in labouring women who have an epiduralcatheter in situ and established analgesia and need unplannedCaesareanMedDRA version: 20.0Level: PTClassification code 10024758Term: Local anaesthesiaSystem Organ Class: 10042613 - Surgical and medical proceduresEUCTR2016-000298-20-DESintetica S.A.96
终止
3 期
Chloroprocaine 3% - Epidural Anesthesia in Unplanned Caesarean SectionUnplanned Caesarean SectionNCT02919072Sintetica SA16
进行中（未招募）
1 期
A comparison of chloroprocaine 3% versus levobupivacaine 0.5% for epidural anesthesia during caesarean section.anesthetics for women scheduled for elective caesarean sectionEUCTR2015-004918-22-BEGhent University Hospital
尚未招募
不适用
COMPARISON OF CHLOROPROCAINE WITH ROPIVACAINE FOR SPINAL ANAESTHESIA IN SHORT GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERIESCTRI/2019/10/021521niversity College of Medical Sciences