跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04109794
NCT04109794已完成不适用

Comparison of Two Techniques in Gingival Recession Treatment. One-year Clinical Follow-up Study

Kırıkkale University0 个研究点目标入组 42 人开始时间: 2012年12月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
42
主要终点
recession depth

研究概览

简要总结

42 patients were treated either with E-CTG (N=20) or SCAF (N=22). The recordings included clinician-based (recession depth, recession width, probing depth, clinical attachment level, keratinized tissue width, tissue thickness, clinical attachment gain (CAG), root coverage (RC), keratinized tissue change (KTC)) and patient-based (wound healing index (WHI), dentine hypersensitivity (DH), tissue appearance, patient expectations and aesthetics) parameters that were taken at baseline, T1 (sixth week), T2 (sixth month) and T3 (first year).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • single Miller I GR defects ≤3mm at upper anterior or premolar teeth
  • systemically healthy
  • identifiable cemento-enamel junction (CEJ)

排除标准

  • periodontal surgery experience in the past two years
  • excessive contacts
  • loss of vitality
  • pregnancy

结局指标

主要结局

recession depth

时间窗: 12 months

Distance between CEJ and GM

次要结局

  • keratinized tissue width(12 months)
  • clinical attachment level(12 months)
  • recession width(12 months)
  • probing depth(12 months)

研究者

发起方
Kırıkkale University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

H. Gencay Keceli

Associate Professor

Kırıkkale University

相似试验