MedPath

Comparative evaluation of 3-D printer assisted surgical planning versus traditional free fibula planning in surgical outcomes in mandibular reconstruction –A prospective study

Not Applicable
Conditions
Health Condition 1: C00-C14- Malignant neoplasms of lip, oral cavity and pharynx
Registration Number
CTRI/2024/03/064354
Lead Sponsor
All India Institute of Medical Sciences,New Delhi
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ot Yet Recruiting
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
0
Inclusion Criteria

All patients who requires segmental mandibulectomy and reconstruction as primary surgery and willing to follow up.

Exclusion Criteria

all patients with peripheral vascular disease, or arteria peronea magna, salvage surgery or h/o trauma

Study & Design

Study Type
Observational
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To compare symmetry and morphometric measurements in CAD-CAM planning versus traditional technique in free fibula planning for mandibular reconstruction.Timepoint: 3 months after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To compare the functional and aesthetic outcome between two techniques after surgeryTimepoint: 3 months after surgery
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath