跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03525691
NCT03525691终止不适用

Enhanced Lung Protective Ventilation With Extracorporeal CO2 Removal During Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Hôpital Européen Marseille1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 3 人开始时间: 2018年5月23日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
发起方
入组人数
3
试验地点
1
主要终点
Change in PaCO2

研究概览

简要总结

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is associated with a mortality rate of 30 - 45 % and required invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) in almost 85 % of patients[1]. During controlled MV, driving pressure (i.e., the difference between end-inspiratory and end-expiratory airway pressure) depends of both tidal volume and respiratory system compliance. Either excessive tidal volume or reduced lung aeration may increase the driving pressure. ARDS patients receiving tidal volume of 6 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW) and having a day-1 driving pressure ≥ 14 cmH2O have an increased risk of death in the hospital[2]. Seemly, in the LUNG SAFE observational cohort, ARDS patients having a day-1 driving pressure < 11 cmH2O had the lowest risk of death in the hospital[1]. Hence, driving pressure acts as a major contributor of mortality in ARDS, and probably reflects excessive regional lung distension resulting in pro-inflammatory and fibrotic biological processes. Whether decreasing the driving pressure by an intervention change mortality remains an hypothesis; but one of means is to decrease the tidal volume from 6 to 4 ml/ kg predicted body weight (PBW). However, this strategy promotes hypercarbia, at constant respiratory rate, by decreasing the alveolar ventilation. In this setting, implementing an extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) therapy prevents from hypercarbia. A number of low-flow ECCO2R devices are now available and some of those use renal replacement therapy (RRT) platform. The investigators previously reported that combining a membrane oxygenator (0.65 m²) within a hemofiltration circuit provides efficacious low flow ECCO2R and blood purification in patients presenting with both ARDS and Acute Kidney injury[3].

This study aims to investigate the efficacy of an original ECCO2R system combining a 0.67 m² membrane oxygenator (Lilliput 2, SORIN) inserted within a specific circuit (HP-X, BAXTER) and mounted on a RRT monitor (PrismafleX, BAXTER). Such a therapy only aims to provide decarboxylation but not blood purification and has the huge advantage to be potentially implemented in most ICUs without requiring a specific ECCO2R device. The study will consist in three periods:

  • The first period will address the efficacy of this original ECCO2R system at tidal volume of 6 and 4 ml/kg PBW using an off-on-off design.
  • The second part will investigate the effect of varying the sweep gas flow (0-2-4-6-8-10 l/min) and the mixture of the sweep gas (Air/O2) on the CO2 removal rate.
  • The third part will compare three ventilatory strategies applied in a crossover design:
  1. Minimal distension: Tidal volume 4 ml/kg PBW and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) based on the ARDSNet PEEP/FiO2 table (ARMA).
  2. Maximal recruitment: 4 ml/kg PBW and PEEP adjusted to maintain a plateau pressure between 23 - 25 cmH2O.
  3. Standard: Tidal volume 6 ml/kg and PEEP based on the ARDSNet PEEP/FiO2 table (ARMA).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • ARDS moderate or severe (Berlin criteria)
  • Onset < 48 h
  • Driving pressure ≥ 11 cmH2O

排除标准

  • Lack of consent or social protection
  • Chronic respiratory failure (requiring Oxygen or NIPPV)
  • Severe hypoxemia: PaO2/FIO2 < 80 with PEEP ≥ 18 cmH2O AND FIO2= 1
  • Acute Renal Failure requiring RRT
  • DNR order or death expected within the next 72 hours
  • Planned surgery or transport out-of-ICU expected within the next 72 hours
  • Heparin allergy
  • Contraindication to jugular vein catheterization
  • Intracranial Hypertension

结局指标

主要结局

Change in PaCO2

时间窗: 15 minutes after initiation of ECCO2R at tidal volume of 4 ml/kg PBW.

20 % decrease in PaCO2 after initiation of ECCO2R at tidal volume of 4 ml/kg PBW (as compared to 4 ml/kg without ECCO2R)

次要结局

  • CO2 removal rate(each 15 minutes up to the third hour (Part I and II of the study). In the third part, measurement at baseline and at 1 hour and at 22 hours into each arm.)
  • Type III Procollagen(Only in the third part, measurement at baseline and at 1 hour and at 22 hours into each arm.)
  • Plasma Cytokines(Only in the third part, measurement at baseline and at 1 hour and at 22 hours into each arm.)
  • PaCO2(each 15 minutes up to the third hour (Part I and II of the study). In the third part, measurement at baseline and at 1 hour and at 22 hours into each arm.)
  • Transpulmonary pressure and work of breathing(each 15 minutes up to the third hour (Part I and II of the study). In the third part, measurement at baseline and at 1 hour and at 22 hours into each arm.)
  • Regional tidal ventilation(each 15 minutes up to the third hour (Part I and II of the study). In the third part, measurement at baseline and at 1 hour and at 22 hours into each arm.)
  • End-expiratory Lung Volume(each 15 minutes up to the third hour (Part I and II of the study). In the third part, measurement at baseline and at 1 hour and at 22 hours into each arm.)
  • Pulmonary Inflammatory and Fibrotic pathway(Only in the third part, measurement at baseline and at 1 hour and at 22 hours into each arm.)
  • Pulmonary Cytokines(Only in the third part, measurement at baseline and at 1 hour and at 22 hours into each arm.)

研究者

发起方
Hôpital Européen Marseille
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Jerome Allardet-Servent, MD

Principal Investigator

Hôpital Européen Marseille

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验