Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05419518
NCT05419518RecruitingPhase 2

Palliative Dose Escalated Radiation for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases and Painful Non-Bone Metastases

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey7 sites in 1 country124 target enrollmentStarted: March 16, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 2
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
124
Locations
7
Primary Endpoint
Safety as assessed by number of participants experiencing adverse events

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesize that with dose escalation to 40-50 Gy in ten fractions, the complete pain response rate at one month can be increased to 40-50% in painful non-spinal bone metastases. Additionally, the investigators hypothesize that utilizing a fractionation scheme with an escalated biologically equivalent dose (BED) will result in a higher proportion of participants responding to treatment, and will also lead to more durable responses. Furthermore, the investigators hypothesize that with dose escalation to 40-50 Gy in ten fractions, the complete pain response rate at one month can be increased to 35-45% in painful non-bone metastases

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate dose escalation and pain response in patients with painful non-spinal bone metastases and painful non-bone metastases treated with radiation therapy.

Primary Objective:

To evaluate improvement of complete pain response rate in painful non-spine bone metastases and painful non-bone metastases with dose escalated radiation using a ten fraction radiation regimen

Secondary Objectives:

To evaluate best pain response To evaluate mean pain scores To evaluate the duration of pain response To evaluate the changes in quality-of-life following radiation To evaluate the rates of retreatment with radiation secondary to disease or symptom progression To evaluate treatment related toxicity

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Have provided signed informed consent for the trial
  • Aged ≥18 years at the time of informed consent
  • Histologic proof of malignancy
  • Radiologic or histologic evidence of bone metastases or non-bone metastases
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of ≥3
  • Pain Score ≥ 3
  • Life expectancy of six months or more
  • Willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol
  • A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant and not breastfeeding
  • Woman of childbearing potential who agrees to follow contraceptive guidance during the treatment period and for at least 120 days after the last dose of study treatment.
  • A male participant must agree to use contraception during the treatment period and for at least 120 days after the last dose of study treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Metastasis from a highly radiosensitive tumor (eg, lymphoma, myeloma, germ cell tumor)
  • Spinal metastasis
  • Active compression of spinal cord/cauda equina
  • Previous RT or SBRT to the same site
  • > 3 sites requiring radiation treatment

Arms & Interventions

Therapeutic benefit

No Intervention

Radiation will be delivered as per protocol. For participants experiencing unacceptable toxicity related to study treatment, yet obtaining therapeutic benefit, participants will be allowed to continue treatment, if well tolerated at the discretion of the investigator.

Palliative radiation dose escalation

Experimental

The prescribed dose is 50 Gy in 10 fractions. The total dose can be reduced to 40 Gy and the total number of fractions can be reduced to 8 fractions in non-spine metastases to achieve the normal tissue constraints.

Intervention: EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION (Biological)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Safety as assessed by number of participants experiencing adverse events

Time Frame: One month

Number of participants experiencing adverse effects grade three or higher, as defined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Severity as assessed by number of participants experiencing toxicity and adverse events(One month)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Matthew Pierre Deek

Assistant Professor, Radiation Oncology

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Study Sites (7)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials